Teams

Simpson/Downes/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women - Friday AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-16vs PM-Monte/Spittle/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer McNabb / Jennifer Meeks vs Claudia Paz / Dianne Davenport7-5, 6-1
2025-07-11vs Schneider/Vestevich/NashvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKatherine Goodson / Barbee Morgan vs Beth Martin / Hope Cummiskey6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCaroline Bryan / Julie Dearman vs Lissa Vestevich / Leah Lamphron1-6, 6-7
2025-07-10vs ThPM-Blevins /Thomas/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Cesarone / Nikki Downes vs Mollie Alvarez / Gretchen Olson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzy Simpson / Stephanie Snap vs Maryam Khan / Kelly Clapp6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Webb / Angela Tarrance vs Ashley West / Tammy Shrivalle6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-02vs Gannon/Triplett/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Dearman / Melissa Burton vs Teresa Proud / Kathy McCabe6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-27vs Songstad/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLiza Robinson / Yukari Moriyama vs Patti Hudgins / Erin Simpson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Snap / Melissa Chadwick vs Christy Hermann / Gretchen Dahle2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer McNabb / Caroline Bryan vs Sacha Bone / Joelle Speed3-6, 4-6
2025-06-20vs Delves/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Cesarone / Yukari Moriyama vs Leah Kewley / Julia Byron7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Chadwick / Nikki Downes vs Scotty Falk / Carol Jones4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Webb / Julie Dearman vs Dodson Randolph / Chantelle Duncan5-7, 1-6
2025-06-18vs Rose/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Bryan / Angela Tarrance vs Kelly Montgomery / Shalini Rose4-6, 2-6
2025-06-12vs ThPM-Ossman/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Cesarone / Melissa Chadwick vs Palina Beck / Lori Warrick4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbee Morgan / Stephanie Snap vs Kathleen Carbonari / Cindy Mccullough2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Dearman / Angela Tarrance vs Sara Baker / Sara Gibbs2-6, 4-6
2025-06-11vs PM-Monte/Spittle/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer McNabb / Julie Dearman vs Claudia Paz / Preeti Arla7-5, 6-3
2025-06-05vs ThPM-Blevins /Thomas/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarrie Jones / Liza Robinson vs Stacy Thomas / Rachel Fogarty2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzy Simpson / Katherine Goodson vs Cari Blevins / Julie Lavigne6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Bryan / Jennifer McNabb vs Janelle VanHootegem / Rebecca Bourlakas1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women - Friday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Liza Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Yukari Moriyama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Amy Cesarone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Katherine Goodson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Barbee Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Melissa Chadwick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Stephanie Snap
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Nikki Downes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Suzy Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jennifer McNabb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Julie Dearman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Caroline Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Angela Tarrance
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Goodson + Barbee Morgan6063% games+0.7% vs expected
Amy Cesarone + Melissa Chadwick5356% games−1.9% vs expected
Caroline Bryan + Julie Dearman213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Chadwick + Suzy Simpson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liza Robinson
20W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Yukari Moriyama
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4
Amy Cesarone
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Katherine Goodson
44W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Barbee Morgan
33W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Melissa Chadwick
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Stephanie Snap
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
Nikki Downes
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Suzy Simpson
29W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Jennifer McNabb
19W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Julie Dearman
23W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Caroline Bryan
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Angela Tarrance
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.