Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Cardenas)(CCC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult 40 & over/3.5W8128821243
2GEPTA-Cartwright/Adult 40 & over/3.5W72261030299
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Baeza)(FB)72211534289
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Olmos)(EPTC#3)63231332293
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gallagher)(NMSU)54211533307
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gutierrez)(EPTC#2)45132349350
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Abbud)(CCC#2)36142248366
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)36112553379
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Allen)(TW#1)27142250372
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Cardenas)(CCC#1)0992759396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Barbara Hatch
published 3.5
3.04
Cynthia Canales
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.89
Carla Canales
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #2 Singles 24% · published 3
2.82
Celia Al-Tahan
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3
2.41
Carmen Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published 3
Kismet Sozer
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Laura Houston
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Lorena Sosa
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lourdes Olivas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Mariaelena Sozer
published
Regina Porras
usually #1 Singles 52%, also #2 Singles 19% · published
Sandra Alost
published
Shelley Danforth
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Stacy Mayo
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Tamara Elkins
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lourdes Olivas + Celia Al-Tahan273547% games+5.4% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Celia Al-Tahan21737% games+0.2% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Lorena Sosa0830% games−15.8% vs expected
Lorena Sosa + Stacy Mayo81644% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Danforth + Laura Houston7653% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Danforth + Stacy Mayo5547% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Mayo + Regina Porras2845% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Cardenas + Stacy Mayo0925% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Hatch
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Canales
24W–37L career · 27 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Carla Canales
49W–55L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Celia Al-Tahan
119W–164L career · 57 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Carmen Cardenas
31W–115L career · type A · 30 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.41
Kismet Sozer
41W–53L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Houston
49W–20L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorena Sosa
64W–114L career · 40 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lourdes Olivas
98W–118L career · 41 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
18W–67L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariaelena Sozer
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Regina Porras
20W–49L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Alost
31W–60L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Danforth
21W–32L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Mayo
47W–97L career · 45 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tamara Elkins
7W–18L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.