Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Olmos)(EPTC#3)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult 40 & over/3.5W8128821243
2GEPTA-Cartwright/Adult 40 & over/3.5W72261030299
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Baeza)(FB)72211534289
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Olmos)(EPTC#3)63231332293
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gallagher)(NMSU)54211533307
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gutierrez)(EPTC#2)45132349350
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Abbud)(CCC#2)36142248366
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)36112553379
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Allen)(TW#1)27142250372
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Cardenas)(CCC#1)0992759396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
ALEJANDRA MONROY
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.28
Blanca Olmos
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.28
Cristal Tirado
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 24% · published 3.5
3.25
Estela Abelleira
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
3.19
Ana Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.08
Felisa Fuentes
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
3.07
Dolly Ricks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.90
Concepcion Bueno
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published 3
2.83
Ada Castro
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.60
Angelica Neve
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published 3
Laura Soto
usually #1 Singles 65%, also #2 Singles 24% · published
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Monica Medina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rocio Avila
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Roma Fonseca
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Sabrina Monroy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Sandra Castaneda
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 41% · published
Tatiana Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #2 Singles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sabrina Monroy + Rocio Avila11459% games+15.9% vs expected
Concepcion Bueno + Blanca Olmos11264% games+0.5% vs expected
Sandra Castaneda + ALEJANDRA MONROY15758% gamesnot enough data
Ana Dominguez + Estela Abelleira12658% gamesnot enough data
Estela Abelleira + Blanca Olmos9858% gamesnot enough data
Ana Dominguez + Blanca Olmos8757% gamesnot enough data
Cristal Tirado + Angelica Neve8649% gamesnot enough data
Roma Fonseca + Sabrina Monroy6458% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
ALEJANDRA MONROY
44W–23L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Blanca Olmos
95W–73L career · 42 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cristal Tirado
27W–17L career · 16 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Estela Abelleira
39W–43L career · 34 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ana Dominguez
48W–51L career · 39 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Felisa Fuentes
56W–22L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Dolly Ricks
58W–73L career · 22 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Concepcion Bueno
64W–27L career · 27 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Ada Castro
33W–36L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Angelica Neve
30W–32L career · 29 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Laura Soto
38W–28L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
44W–31L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Medina
38W–24L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocio Avila
58W–30L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roma Fonseca
54W–32L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sabrina Monroy
43W–30L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Castaneda
56W–46L career · 32 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tatiana Fernandez
51W–14L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.