Teams

Qualifying Team

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-31vs Smash406Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDeedee Jussila / Thomas Sawatzke vs Joe Salyer / Rose Demaray3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Mattie / Jill Mattie vs Ned Tranel / Laura Rembe5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKellie Saville / Steve Saville vs Darcy Kovacs / Andrew Salyer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-25vs Smash406Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDeedee Jussila / Thomas Sawatzke vs Ned Tranel / Laura Rembe5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKellie Saville / Steve Saville vs Darcy Kovacs / Andrew Salyer6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShannon Johnson / Matt Delao vs Cyndy Desin / Hogan Smelker3-6, 1-6
2021-05-24vs Smash406Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Mattie / Jill Mattie vs Joe Salyer / Rose Demaray4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKellie Saville / Steve Saville vs Cyndy Desin / Hogan Smelker4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatt Delao / Jackie Yamanaka-Williams vs Darcy Kovacs / Andrew Salyer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deedee Jussila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jackie Yamanaka-Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andrew Mattie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jill Mattie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kellie Saville
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Rembe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matt Delao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Kastner
published
Steve Saville
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Sawatzke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellie Saville + Steve Saville123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deedee Jussila
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Jackie Yamanaka-Williams
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Andrew Mattie
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jill Mattie
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kellie Saville
14W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Rembe
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Matt Delao
4W–40L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Kastner
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Saville
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Sawatzke
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.