Teams

Smash406

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-31vs Qualifying TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe Salyer / Rose Demaray vs Deedee Jussila / Thomas Sawatzke6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNed Tranel / Laura Rembe vs Andrew Mattie / Jill Mattie7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDarcy Kovacs / Andrew Salyer vs Kellie Saville / Steve Saville6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-05-25vs Qualifying TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesNed Tranel / Laura Rembe vs Deedee Jussila / Thomas Sawatzke7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDarcy Kovacs / Andrew Salyer vs Kellie Saville / Steve Saville6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCyndy Desin / Hogan Smelker vs Shannon Johnson / Matt Delao6-3, 6-1
2021-05-24vs Qualifying TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoe Salyer / Rose Demaray vs Andrew Mattie / Jill Mattie6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCyndy Desin / Hogan Smelker vs Kellie Saville / Steve Saville6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDarcy Kovacs / Andrew Salyer vs Matt Delao / Jackie Yamanaka-Williams1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darcy Kovacs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Andrew Salyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Hogan Smelker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joe Salyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Rembe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ned Tranel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rose Demaray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darcy Kovacs + Andrew Salyer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darcy Kovacs
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 5 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.93
Andrew Salyer
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Hogan Smelker
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Joe Salyer
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Rembe
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ned Tranel
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rose Demaray
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.