Teams

KY/OWB/GREENE

2025 USTA LEAGUE ADULT 18 & OVER OWENSBORO · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-29vs KY/OWB/GRAYLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanie Walther / Anna Greene vs Elizabeth Hayden / Caroline Hayden1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSara Appleby / Carolyn Hume vs Kerry Bodenheimer / Brenda Clayton7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesIsabelle Reisz vs Charly Hayden3-6, 3-6
2025-05-28vs KY/OWB/GRAYLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Greene / Janie Walther vs Elizabeth Scheessele / Lorien Appman0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesIsabelle Reisz vs Sophey Jennings2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSara Appleby / Carolyn Hume vs Brenda Clayton / Kerry Bodenheimer3-6, 5-7
2025-05-24vs KY/OWB/GRAYLost 04
L#1 DoublesSara Appleby / Becky Mitchell vs Robin Royster / Brandy Harpenau2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Greene / Carolyn Hume vs Stephanie Gray / Lauren Patmore2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesIsabelle Reisz vs Cassy Gobin4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen St Clair / Anna Pierce vs Elizabeth Scheessele / Lorien Appman1-6, 0-6
2025-05-24vs KY/OWB/GRAYLost 13
W#1 DoublesSara Appleby / Becky Mitchell vs Robin Royster / Brandy Harpenau7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesIsabelle Reisz vs Charly Hayden3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Pierce / Kathleen St Clair vs Caroline Hayden / Elizabeth Hayden3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Greene / Carolyn Hume vs Stephanie Gray / Lauren Patmore3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Carolyn Hume
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Isabelle Reisz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Anna Greene
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Becky Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janie Walther
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen St Clair
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sara Appleby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Greene + Becky Mitchell2349% gamesnot enough data
Janie Walther + Anna Greene044 matchesnot enough data
Anna Greene + Carolyn Hume033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Pierce
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Carolyn Hume
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Isabelle Reisz
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Anna Greene
27W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Becky Mitchell
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janie Walther
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen St Clair
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Appleby
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.