Teams

KY/OWB/GRAY

2025 USTA LEAGUE ADULT 18 & OVER OWENSBORO · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-29vs KY/OWB/GREENEWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hayden / Caroline Hayden vs Janie Walther / Anna Greene6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKerry Bodenheimer / Brenda Clayton vs Sara Appleby / Carolyn Hume6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCharly Hayden vs Isabelle Reisz6-3, 6-3
2025-05-28vs KY/OWB/GREENEWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Scheessele / Lorien Appman vs Anna Greene / Janie Walther6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSophey Jennings vs Isabelle Reisz6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrenda Clayton / Kerry Bodenheimer vs Sara Appleby / Carolyn Hume6-3, 7-5
2025-05-24vs KY/OWB/GREENEWon 40
W#1 DoublesRobin Royster / Brandy Harpenau vs Sara Appleby / Becky Mitchell6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Gray / Lauren Patmore vs Anna Greene / Carolyn Hume6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCassy Gobin vs Isabelle Reisz6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Scheessele / Lorien Appman vs Kathleen St Clair / Anna Pierce6-1, 6-0
2025-05-24vs KY/OWB/GREENEWon 31
L#1 DoublesRobin Royster / Brandy Harpenau vs Sara Appleby / Becky Mitchell6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCharly Hayden vs Isabelle Reisz6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCaroline Hayden / Elizabeth Hayden vs Anna Pierce / Kathleen St Clair6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephanie Gray / Lauren Patmore vs Anna Greene / Carolyn Hume6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Charly Hayden
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.90
Elizabeth Scheessele
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Sophey Jennings
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Caroline Hayden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Brandy Harpenau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Lauren Patmore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Kerry Bodenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Cassy Gobin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Lorien Appman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Brenda Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Elizabeth Hayden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robin Royster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Gray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Gray + Lauren Patmore4256% games+13.5% vs expected
Robin Royster + Elizabeth Scheessele3259% games+4.6% vs expected
Kerry Bodenheimer + Brenda Clayton5452% games−3.0% vs expected
Robin Royster + Lorien Appman4353% games−5.8% vs expected
Robin Royster + Cassy Gobin3255% gamesnot enough data
Lorien Appman + Elizabeth Scheessele213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charly Hayden
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Elizabeth Scheessele
27W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Sophey Jennings
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Caroline Hayden
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Brandy Harpenau
44W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Lauren Patmore
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Kerry Bodenheimer
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Cassy Gobin
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
Lorien Appman
61W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Brenda Clayton
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Elizabeth Hayden
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Royster
41W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Gray
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.