Teams

Royal Oaks/Bard W.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

15 players · average NTRP 2.71 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-20vs DAC/Gaitonde-Erickson W3.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesAli JACKSON / Kyla Coots vs Liz Irons / Katie Wietjes1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMEREDITH HOWARTH vs Grace Davis7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCourtney Sparks / Mallory Tonick vs Kristi Kendall / Pallavi Gaitonde0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Chalfant / Amanda Toussaint vs Kristie Ince / Selina Knudson6-1, 6-1
2025-06-19vs High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesAmanda Toussaint / Catherine Cashin vs Kelly Lilley / Jennalee Trammel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAli JACKSON / Kathryn Storms vs Liz Lemaster / Jennifer Parr1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMEREDITH HOWARTH vs Kristen Fenner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKarla Bard / Susan Long vs Cathy Daniels / Jaclyn Whisenant6-1, 7-6
L#1 DoublesAli JACKSON / Karla Bard vs Shelby Dolson / Bethany Williamson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLeeAnn Wood / Kyla Coots vs Elizabeth Hildebrand / Evy Dinsmore6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCatherine Cashin / Rachel Wallace vs Emily Perry / Emily Ledet5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Kyla Coots
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
LeeAnn Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
MEREDITH HOWARTH
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.75
Elizabeth Chalfant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Karla Bard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
2.72
Kathryn Storms
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Amanda Toussaint
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Alison Stokley
published 3
2.62
Catherine Cashin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.42
Ali JACKSON
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Claire Reyes
published 2.5
2.21
Courtney Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Haley DeVault
published
Mallory Tonick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LeeAnn Wood + Kyla Coots11456% games+6.3% vs expected
MEREDITH HOWARTH + Cynthia Langhorst1641% games−1.4% vs expected
Alison Stokley + Elizabeth Chalfant134 matchesnot enough data
Ali JACKSON + Catherine Cashin134 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Chalfant + Amanda Toussaint213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyla Coots
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
LeeAnn Wood
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
MEREDITH HOWARTH
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Elizabeth Chalfant
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Karla Bard
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Cynthia Langhorst
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Kathryn Storms
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Amanda Toussaint
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Alison Stokley
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
2.5
Catherine Cashin
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
2.5
Ali JACKSON
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.42
2.5
Claire Reyes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Courtney Sparks
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Haley DeVault
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mallory Tonick
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.