Teams

Samuell Grand/Saunders-Bricker W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs DAC/Gaitonde-Erickson W3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesNatalie Wade / Bethany Williamson vs Pallavi Gaitonde / Veronica Erickson1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristy Mathot vs Liz Irons3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Perry / Emily Ledet vs Kristi Kendall / Joli Shaw2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHaley Collard / Evy Dinsmore vs Annette Baker / Lori Josselyn3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-19vs Stonebridge/Graham-Martinson W3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesBethany Williamson / Kristy Mathot vs Carrie Martinson / Dianne Dolly Reid1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Saunders / Emily Perry vs Natalia Abramyan / Sara Mahmood0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEvy Dinsmore vs Samantha Pennell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHaley Collard / Kacy Kurek vs Jennifer Griffiths / Valbona Martin3-6, 0-6
2025-06-18vs DCC/Cardwell-Dunn W3.0Lost 14
L#1 DoublesJamie Bricker / Bethany Williamson vs Nellie Dunn / Laura McCullough0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesEvy Dinsmore vs Margaret Fuller1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristy Mathot / Emily Perry vs Jennifer Carlson / Skyler Baty3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKacy Kurek vs Amy Sherman4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Saunders / Haley Collard vs Daley Bennett / Adrienne Pulliam6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJamie Bricker / Kristy Mathot vs April Jorgensen / Paige Buffington7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEmily Hildebrand / Adrienne Saunders vs Gayle McBride / Rae Hirigoyen6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Hildebrand vs Kathaleen Wilcoxson7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHaley Collard / Kacy Kurek vs Dee Bray / Jennifer Fleming4-6, 0-6
2025-05-29vs Royal Oaks/Bard W.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesShelby Dolson / Bethany Williamson vs Ali JACKSON / Karla Bard6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hildebrand / Evy Dinsmore vs LeeAnn Wood / Kyla Coots1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAdrienne Saunders vs Susan Long4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Perry / Emily Ledet vs Catherine Cashin / Rachel Wallace7-5, 6-0
2025-05-22vs Lakes/Falke-Johnson W3.0Lost 05
L#1 DoublesNatalie Wade / Bethany Williamson vs Jennifer Dvorak / Salina Johnson1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKristy Mathot vs Natalie Weatherford2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKacy Kurek / Adrienne Saunders vs Lauren Sorden / Sharon Bruley2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEvy Dinsmore vs Sherry Falke2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Perry / Haley Collard vs Jennifer OCarroll / Kim Mundorff5-7, 1-6
2025-05-14vs High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesNatalie Wade / Shelby Dolson vs Chrissy Barth / Sherri Bloom3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEvy Dinsmore vs Lisa Lodge0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Bricker / Emily Hildebrand vs Liz Lemaster / Karen Motz7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKristy Mathot vs Jennifer Parr5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Saunders / Kacy Kurek vs Darla Searles / SHIRL MCKINNEY3-6, 5-7
2025-05-08vs SpringPark BLUE/S. Nolen W3.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hildebrand / Kristy Mathot vs Tanya Rutledge / Anna Knighton1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Saunders / Natalie Wade vs Barbara Hopkins / Jackie Hurtado6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJamie Bricker vs Chana Hines6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DAC/Farrell-Elliott W3.0 (F2025 WC)7132819231
2DAC/Shortt-Phillips W3.07132820224
3The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.07132823255
4DCC/Cardwell-Dunn W3.071291127268
5Wagon Wheel/Hayes-Miller W3.071291127245
6Canyon Creek/Samber-Allen W3.071261433301
7Cooper/Martin-Soare W3.06231923243
8Lakes @ CH/McCarthy-Springer W3.062261435322
9Wilkerson Sanders/Hall-Watson W3.062231741327
10Fretz/Liechty-Moore W3.053251533278
11Wilkerson Sanders/Jorgensen-Smart W3.053202047363
12Samuell Grand/Egan-Neblett W3.044241637348
13DCC/Dale-DaleW3.044221842347
14High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.044192146348
15McKinney/Bearden-Belle Isle W3.044172348337
16Royal Oaks/Bard W.035182248370
17Wagon Wheel/Evans-Olson W3.035142655380
18Garland/Grandle-Howarth W3.035142655384
19Samuell Grand/Saunders-Bricker W3.035142655400
20Brook Hollow/Davis-Rome W3.035132757406
21Greenhill/Wilson-Garcia-Tufro W3.035132760405
22DAC/Gaitonde-Erickson W3.026162453405
23El Dorado/Miller W3.026122858394
24Lakes/Frazier-Johnson W3.017112959410
25RGAC/Dopkins W3.017103064421
26Chandlers Landing/Brummett W3.00863470448

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Emily Hildebrand
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
2.96
Bethany Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Kristy Mathot
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.83
Jamie Bricker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Natalie Wade
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Emily Ledet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Kacy Kurek
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.58
Evy Dinsmore
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.54
Haley Collard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.47
Elizabeth Hildebrand
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.44
Adrienne Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Shelby Dolson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Bricker + Kristy Mathot5155% games+7.3% vs expected
Kacy Kurek + Haley Collard044 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Wade + Adrienne Saunders134 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Wade + Haley Collard404 matchesnot enough data
Kristy Mathot + Bethany Williamson224 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Dolson + Natalie Wade303 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Dolson + Kristy Mathot213 matchesnot enough data
Kacy Kurek + Adrienne Saunders033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Hildebrand
16W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Bethany Williamson
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Kristy Mathot
24W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Jamie Bricker
16W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Natalie Wade
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Emily Ledet
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Kacy Kurek
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Evy Dinsmore
8W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%28%72%
2.58
2.5
Haley Collard
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
2.5
Elizabeth Hildebrand
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.47
3
Adrienne Saunders
9W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Shelby Dolson
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.