Teams

Stonebridge/Graham-Martinson W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.14 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 SinglesLindsey Hudgins vs Kathryn Dehmer6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristie Anderson / Lea Ellsworth vs Dee Bray / Cory Holland6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSara Mahmood / Natalia Abramyan vs Melissa Holliman / Meredith Dodgen6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNatalia Abramyan / Sara Mahmood vs Adrienne Saunders / Emily Perry6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSamantha Pennell vs Evy Dinsmore6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Griffiths / Valbona Martin vs Haley Collard / Kacy Kurek6-3, 6-0
2025-05-29vs DAC/Gaitonde-Erickson W3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesSamantha Pennell vs Veronica Erickson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLea Ellsworth / Christy Key vs Kristi Kendall / Lori Josselyn6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristie Anderson / Valbona Martin vs Annette Baker / Jenny Dunn5-7, 4-6
2025-05-22vs High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesLindsey Hudgins vs Kristen Fenner6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristie Anderson / Jennifer Griffiths vs Cathy Childress / SHIRL MCKINNEY6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarrie Martinson / Anne Marie Plum vs Lisa Krekeler / Darla Searles4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-12vs DCC/Cardwell-Dunn W3.0Won 30
W#2 DoublesChristy Key / Cindy Graham vs Jennifer Cardwell / Heidi Pickens6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLindsey Hudgins vs Shannon Young6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKristie Anderson / Lea Ellsworth vs Jenny Kearns / Courtney Taylor6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Aubrey Kennedy
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Lea Ellsworth
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Carrie Martinson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Cindy Graham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Valbona Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Heather Jordan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Christy Key
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Dianne Dolly Reid
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Kristie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Christine Lutz
published 3
2.72
Natalia Abramyan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Anne Marie Plum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kelly Killinger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lindsey Hudgins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Samantha Pennell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Sara Mahmood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Graham + Kelly Killinger6072% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Graham + Lea Ellsworth224 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Martinson + Aubrey Kennedy224 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Martinson + Kelly Killinger404 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Martinson + Lea Ellsworth224 matchesnot enough data
Valbona Martin + Dianne Dolly Reid314 matchesnot enough data
Natalia Abramyan + Heather Jordan123 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Martinson + Dianne Dolly Reid213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aubrey Kennedy
30W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Lea Ellsworth
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Carrie Martinson
16W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cindy Graham
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Valbona Martin
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Heather Jordan
27W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Christy Key
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Dianne Dolly Reid
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Kristie Anderson
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Christine Lutz
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalia Abramyan
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
2.5
Anne Marie Plum
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%40%60%
2.54
Kelly Killinger
16W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Hudgins
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Pennell
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Mahmood
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.