Teams

SpringPark BLUE/S. Nolen W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

11 players · average NTRP 2.79 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-24vs High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Knighton / Jackie Hurtado vs Chrissy Barth / Sherri Bloom1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChana Hines vs Irene Weaver2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDana McMahon / Barbara Hopkins vs Sherre Barton / Cathy Childress6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-05vs DAC/Gaitonde-Erickson W3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Knighton / Tanya Rutledge vs Pallavi Gaitonde / Veronica Erickson6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Hopkins / Chana Hines vs Jenny Dunn / Liz Irons3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesTanya Rutledge / Anna Knighton vs April Jorgensen / Paige Buffington5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Hopkins / Chana Hines vs Dee Bray / Jennifer Fleming1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-22vs DCC/Cardwell-Dunn W3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLeslie Massenburg / Tanya Rutledge vs Laura McCullough / Destin Shore7-5, 7-6
L#2 SinglesChana Hines vs Nellie Dunn0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Hurtado / Barbara Hopkins vs Lauren Sears / Amy Sherman3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesTanya Rutledge / Anna Knighton vs Elizabeth Hildebrand / Kristy Mathot6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBarbara Hopkins / Jackie Hurtado vs Adrienne Saunders / Natalie Wade3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesChana Hines vs Jamie Bricker1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Anna Knighton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Tanya Rutledge
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.65
Barbara Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Chin Su
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Carol Chandler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.52
Jackie Hurtado
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Anna Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
2.49
Treva Grimshaw
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.43
Chana Hines
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Dana McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Leslie Massenburg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Rutledge + Anna Knighton5944% games+3.4% vs expected
Treva Grimshaw + Barbara Hopkins044 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Hopkins + Jackie Hurtado044 matchesnot enough data
Treva Grimshaw + Chin Su213 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Rutledge + Carol Chandler033 matchesnot enough data
Anna Knighton + Jackie Hurtado033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna Knighton
19W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Tanya Rutledge
16W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Barbara Hopkins
4W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Chin Su
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Carol Chandler
9W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.56
Jackie Hurtado
7W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Anna Gonzalez
16W–21L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.49
Treva Grimshaw
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Chana Hines
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Dana McMahon
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Massenburg
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.