Teams

Canyon Creek/Samber-Allen W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

24 players · average NTRP 2.95 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs JCC/Cloud-Austry W3.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesAnna Dirickson / Lori Steenken vs Andrea Detz / Michelle McArtor1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMaryMarshall Martinez / Ashley Pulliam vs Brister Robin / Kimberly Ross2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesSheridan Lang vs Kerri Hill6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-16vs Samuell Grand/Jordan-Taylor W3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesSheridan Lang vs Nancy Taylor0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMaryMarshall Martinez / Lindsay Schardt vs Stacy Davies / Agueda Jacobo7-5, 6-3
2025-06-05vs Wagon Wheel/Evans-Olson W3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsey Pineyro / Monica Miles vs Gretchen Wise / Lauri Johnston3-6, 2-6
2025-05-29vs Gleneagles/Shores-Kearney W3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesLori Steenken vs Kayla Ellingson4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChantelle Chandler / Sheridan Lang vs Sara Coyle / Megan Gean6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKristie Walsh vs Laralei Priebe0-6, 1-6
2025-05-15vs The Nelson/Galjour W3.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesMonica Miles / Lindsey Pineyro vs Nicole Schoemaker / Kateri Dodson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLindsay Schardt / Emily Swim vs Stacie Strole / Julie Galjour3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesSheridan Lang vs Erika Iannariello6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristie Walsh / Ashley Pulliam vs Amy CLARK / Kristi Stacy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-09vs Northwood/Shaw-Smith W3.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesLindsey Pineyro / Jennifer Spoons vs Sallie Behnke / Kathleen Beck6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristie Walsh / Amy Castro vs Kate Busch / Melissa Graham0-6, 1-6
2025-05-08vs Greenhill/Dale-Stephens W3.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesChantelle Chandler / Sheridan Lang vs Haley Dale / Claudia Watrous6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLindsay Schardt / Emily Swim vs Cortney Sanders / Tina Symonds6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DAC/Farrell-Elliott W3.0 (F2025 WC)7132819231
2DAC/Shortt-Phillips W3.07132820224
3The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.07132823255
4DCC/Cardwell-Dunn W3.071291127268
5Wagon Wheel/Hayes-Miller W3.071291127245
6Canyon Creek/Samber-Allen W3.071261433301
7Cooper/Martin-Soare W3.06231923243
8Lakes @ CH/McCarthy-Springer W3.062261435322
9Wilkerson Sanders/Hall-Watson W3.062231741327
10Fretz/Liechty-Moore W3.053251533278
11Wilkerson Sanders/Jorgensen-Smart W3.053202047363
12Samuell Grand/Egan-Neblett W3.044241637348
13DCC/Dale-DaleW3.044221842347
14High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.044192146348
15McKinney/Bearden-Belle Isle W3.044172348337
16Royal Oaks/Bard W.035182248370
17Wagon Wheel/Evans-Olson W3.035142655380
18Garland/Grandle-Howarth W3.035142655384
19Samuell Grand/Saunders-Bricker W3.035142655400
20Brook Hollow/Davis-Rome W3.035132757406
21Greenhill/Wilson-Garcia-Tufro W3.035132760405
22DAC/Gaitonde-Erickson W3.026162453405
23El Dorado/Miller W3.026122858394
24Lakes/Frazier-Johnson W3.017112959410
25RGAC/Dopkins W3.017103064421
26Chandlers Landing/Brummett W3.00863470448

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Jennifer Spoons
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Gretchen Allen
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.31
Melissa Fox
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.24
Ashley Samber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.14
Kim Henke
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
3.02
Lindsey Pineyro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Emily Lea
published 3
2.93
Monica Miles
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published
2.86
Chantelle Chandler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Lindsay Schardt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Anna Dirickson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Christy Gadoci
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Sherry Clemens
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
MaryMarshall Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Amy Castro
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.60
Dawn Cotter
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.56
Lori Steenken
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Emily Swim
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.50
Ashley Pulliam
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.41
Kristie Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
MRecia Beshires
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Meghan Rosener
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sheridan Lang
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Tarryn Uran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gretchen Allen + Ashley Samber7262% games+11.8% vs expected
Lindsay Schardt + Emily Swim6356% games+11.7% vs expected
Lindsey Pineyro + Amy Castro6256% games+9.2% vs expected
Dawn Cotter + MRecia Beshires044 matchesnot enough data
Gretchen Allen + Jennifer Spoons314 matchesnot enough data
Chantelle Chandler + Lori Steenken224 matchesnot enough data
MaryMarshall Martinez + Ashley Pulliam314 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Pineyro + Lindsay Schardt404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Spoons
32W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Gretchen Allen
39W–9L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Melissa Fox
31W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ashley Samber
33W–14L career · 13 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Kim Henke
11W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lindsey Pineyro
20W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Emily Lea
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Monica Miles
20W–26L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Chantelle Chandler
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Lindsay Schardt
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Anna Dirickson
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Christy Gadoci
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Sherry Clemens
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
MaryMarshall Martinez
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Amy Castro
9W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
3
Dawn Cotter
9W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Lori Steenken
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Emily Swim
16W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%35%65%
2.55
2.5
Ashley Pulliam
10W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.50
Kristie Walsh
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
MRecia Beshires
3W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Rosener
18W–12L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheridan Lang
27W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tarryn Uran
25W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.