Teams

Greenhill/Dale-Stephens W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

17 players · average NTRP 2.69 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-05vs McKinney/Bearden-Belle Isle W3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Watrous / Kristin Erwin vs Kristen Kaufman / Amy Russo0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAJ Stephens / Michelle Bryan vs Jennifer Bearden / Lara Belle-Isle6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHaley Dale / Allison Mentesana vs Melissa Murray / Leslie Hummel6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-05-08vs Canyon Creek/Samber-Allen W3.0Lost 23
W#1 DoublesAJ Stephens / Amy Hilliard vs Dawn Cotter / MRecia Beshires1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSara Rockey vs Kim Henke2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHaley Dale / Claudia Watrous vs Chantelle Chandler / Sheridan Lang3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Whitsitt vs Sherry Clemens6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCortney Sanders / Tina Symonds vs Lindsay Schardt / Emily Swim0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

AJ Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ashley LeMaster
published 3
2.71
Amy Hilliard
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Allison Mentesana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Amy Frommelt
published 2.5
Christy Alderink
published 2.5
Claudia Watrous
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Cortney Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Haley Dale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Kapral
published
Jessica Whitsitt
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kristin Erwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Nugent
published
Lisa Vilfordi
published
Sara Rockey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tina Symonds
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Trisha King
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
AJ Stephens
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ashley LeMaster
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Hilliard
8W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
Allison Mentesana
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Amy Frommelt
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christy Alderink
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Claudia Watrous
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cortney Sanders
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Haley Dale
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Kapral
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Whitsitt
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Erwin
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Nugent
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Vilfordi
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Rockey
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tina Symonds
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Trisha King
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.