Teams

JCC/Cloud-Austry W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-26vs Canyon Creek/Samber-Allen W3.0Lost 12
W#2 DoublesAndrea Detz / Michelle McArtor vs Anna Dirickson / Lori Steenken6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJayna Henstorf vs Monica Miles4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrister Robin / Kimberly Ross vs MaryMarshall Martinez / Ashley Pulliam6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-22vs McKinney/Bearden-Belle Isle W3.0Lost 12
W#2 DoublesAli Wood / Michelle McArtor vs Melinda Meredith / Kelley McCall6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLisa Solomon vs Kristen Kaufman1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanielle Austry / Kimberly Ross vs Lara Belle-Isle / Laura Pavelka4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Shareese Rowland
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.00
Jen Truitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Jayna Henstorf
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Andrea Detz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Ali Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Michelle McArtor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Lily Fish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.87
Lisa Cloud
published
2.80
Danielle Austry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Brister Robin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Lisa Solomon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.25
Alyce Levy
published 2.5
Kristen Briner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Detz + Michelle McArtor8061% games+5.2% vs expected
Danielle Austry + Lisa Cloud9263% games+3.5% vs expected
Jen Truitt + Ali Wood14758% games+2.5% vs expected
Andrea Detz + Shareese Rowland404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shareese Rowland
23W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jen Truitt
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jayna Henstorf
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Andrea Detz
18W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Ali Wood
19W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Michelle McArtor
15W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Lily Fish
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Lisa Cloud
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Danielle Austry
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Brister Robin
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Lisa Solomon
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
2.5
Alyce Levy
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Kristen Briner
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.