Teams

El Dorado/Miller W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-26vs SpringPark RED/S. Nolen W3.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesBrooke Edge / Erma Bryant vs Chelsea Larson / Lisa Adams-Gibbons6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristi lee Condit / Jennifer Marsh vs Roxana Cham / Lauren Klein3-6, 0-6
2025-06-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAlicia Jardine / Allison Compton vs Nancy Benso / Michelle Sowards6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-05vs DAC/Shortt-Phillips W3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooke Edge / Estela Zodrow vs Carolyn Sexton / Logan Shortt2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Marsh / Kristi lee Condit vs Claire Phillips / Sarah Cedillo0-6, 4-6
2025-05-29vs Lakes @ CH/McCarthy-Springer W3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAlicia Jardine / Jennifer Marsh vs Melissa McDade / Hillary Gallego4-6, 1-6
2025-05-15vs RGAC/Dopkins W3.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesBrooke Edge / Kimberly Scarborough vs Ruth Howard / Ellen Palmer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Marsh / Alicia Jardine vs Melissa Cain / Kimberly Rumczikas-Baxter4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-08vs Greenhill/Savelli-Curtis W3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolina Dusenbery / Li Zhang vs Darci Sachdeva / Gerilynn Sanders1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DAC/Farrell-Elliott W3.0 (F2025 WC)7132819231
2DAC/Shortt-Phillips W3.07132820224
3The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.07132823255
4DCC/Cardwell-Dunn W3.071291127268
5Wagon Wheel/Hayes-Miller W3.071291127245
6Canyon Creek/Samber-Allen W3.071261433301
7Cooper/Martin-Soare W3.06231923243
8Lakes @ CH/McCarthy-Springer W3.062261435322
9Wilkerson Sanders/Hall-Watson W3.062231741327
10Fretz/Liechty-Moore W3.053251533278
11Wilkerson Sanders/Jorgensen-Smart W3.053202047363
12Samuell Grand/Egan-Neblett W3.044241637348
13DCC/Dale-DaleW3.044221842347
14High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.044192146348
15McKinney/Bearden-Belle Isle W3.044172348337
16Royal Oaks/Bard W.035182248370
17Wagon Wheel/Evans-Olson W3.035142655380
18Garland/Grandle-Howarth W3.035142655384
19Samuell Grand/Saunders-Bricker W3.035142655400
20Brook Hollow/Davis-Rome W3.035132757406
21Greenhill/Wilson-Garcia-Tufro W3.035132760405
22DAC/Gaitonde-Erickson W3.026162453405
23El Dorado/Miller W3.026122858394
24Lakes/Frazier-Johnson W3.017112959410
25RGAC/Dopkins W3.017103064421
26Chandlers Landing/Brummett W3.00863470448

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
HUIHSIEN CHANG
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Jie Lin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Jennifer Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Erma Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.88
Laura Lembke
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Estela Zodrow
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.85
Amanda Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Allison Compton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Brooke Edge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Carolina Dusenbery
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.29
Alicia Jardine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Julie Stein
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Kelly Clinton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Kimberly Scarborough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristi lee Condit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Li Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Beran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

HUIHSIEN CHANG + Jie Lin6657% games+4.9% vs expected
Jennifer Paulson + Amanda Jackson1439% gamesnot enough data
Erma Bryant + Amanda Jackson213 matchesnot enough data
Carolina Dusenbery + Julie Stein123 matchesnot enough data
Carolina Dusenbery + Alicia Jardine033 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Jackson + Laura Lembke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
HUIHSIEN CHANG
12W–8L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jie Lin
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Paulson
13W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
3
Erma Bryant
28W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Laura Lembke
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Estela Zodrow
29W–23L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Amanda Jackson
10W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Allison Compton
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brooke Edge
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Carolina Dusenbery
4W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Alicia Jardine
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Julie Stein
9W–19L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Clinton
2W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Scarborough
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristi lee Condit
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Li Zhang
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Beran
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.