RHCC BLUE
2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings59 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BTA GREY | 7 | 0 | 9 | 214 |
| 2SSH GREY | 7 | 0 | 11 | 210 |
| 3BTA ORANGE | 7 | 0 | 18 | 267 |
| 4SSLT NAVY | 7 | 0 | 21 | 256 |
| 5NJ BLACK | 6 | 1 | 18 | 248 |
| 6MC RED | 6 | 1 | 21 | 233 |
| 7SSLGT NAVY | 6 | 1 | 22 | 225 |
| 8APR GREEN | 6 | 1 | 22 | 261 |
| 9BM ORANGE | 6 | 1 | 24 | 283 |
| 10CACM GREY | 6 | 1 | 25 | 257 |
| 11NJ GREY | 6 | 1 | 32 | 323 |
| 12GTC BLACK | 6 | 1 | 35 | 321 |
| 13PRKR GOLD | 5 | 1 | 16 | 208 |
| 14SSLT GREEN | 5 | 1 | 18 | 200 |
| 15HRCA RED | 5 | 2 | 32 | 290 |
| 16TTA RED | 5 | 2 | 35 | 318 |
| 17KC GREEN | 5 | 2 | 36 | 305 |
| 18BP ORANGE | 5 | 2 | 37 | 298 |
| 19CM MAROON | 5 | 2 | 38 | 308 |
| 20CR RED | 4 | 2 | 28 | 273 |
| 21CACI RED | 4 | 2 | 30 | 257 |
| 22RCC RED | 4 | 3 | 39 | 320 |
| 23HW BLUE | 4 | 3 | 39 | 322 |
| 24KC ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 39 | 321 |
| 25GTC NAVY | 4 | 3 | 39 | 338 |
| 26KC NAVY | 4 | 3 | 40 | 326 |
| 27GLDN RED | 4 | 3 | 40 | 300 |
| 28LTC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 42 | 348 |
| 29HFII GREEN | 3 | 4 | 34 | 276 |
| 30SKY SILVER | 3 | 4 | 35 | 306 |
| 31GTC BLUE | 3 | 4 | 38 | 319 |
| 32SSG BLUE | 3 | 4 | 38 | 324 |
| 33SSH GREEN | 3 | 4 | 46 | 348 |
| 34HRCA BLUE | 3 | 4 | 48 | 341 |
| 35RRTC NAVY | 2 | 4 | 41 | 305 |
| 36LTA RED | 2 | 5 | 41 | 343 |
| 37KC GREY | 2 | 5 | 42 | 313 |
| 38GAC GREY | 2 | 5 | 45 | 335 |
| 39RHCC BLUE | 2 | 5 | 46 | 352 |
| 40WC NAVY | 2 | 5 | 47 | 363 |
| 41STAP BLUE | 2 | 5 | 47 | 364 |
| 42KC BLUE | 2 | 5 | 48 | 342 |
| 43HRCA BLACK | 2 | 5 | 49 | 370 |
| 44EM RED | 2 | 5 | 52 | 368 |
| 45BRMST MAROON | 2 | 5 | 53 | 377 |
| 46CVTA BLUE | 2 | 5 | 54 | 371 |
| 47LEBTC BLACK | 2 | 5 | 54 | 367 |
| 48SSLT YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 58 | 385 |
| 49SH BLUE | 1 | 5 | 48 | 321 |
| 50MC GOLD | 1 | 6 | 46 | 353 |
| 51BCC RED | 1 | 6 | 49 | 351 |
| 52SKY MAROON | 1 | 6 | 49 | 353 |
| 53KC SILVER | 1 | 6 | 51 | 352 |
| 54WP ORANGE | 1 | 6 | 52 | 365 |
| 55CVTA GREEN | 1 | 6 | 54 | 362 |
| 56APR YELLOW | 1 | 6 | 59 | 388 |
| 57CPV GREEN | 0 | 6 | 53 | 334 |
| 58LTC RED | 0 | 7 | 57 | 380 |
| 59NJ YELLOW | 0 | 7 | 58 | 396 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Terri Lombardi + Jennifer Curtis-Jones | 21–7 | 63% games | +9.1% vs expected |
| Kari Eckert + Jennifer Curtis-Jones | 6–8 | 46% games | −1.3% vs expected |
| Kari Eckert + Tiffany Skiles | 1–5 | 35% games | −5.1% vs expected |
| Tiffany Skiles + Erin Jackman | 5–6 | 48% games | −7.5% vs expected |
| Liby Zachariah + Erin Jackman | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Terri Lombardi + Kari Eckert | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Emilee Noyes + Tiffany Skiles | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.