Teams

BP RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs NJ TEALWon 41
W#1 DoublesMelanie Escobar / Emily Adams vs Lisa Ritchie / Renee Weidemann6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHilary Navy vs Jeanine Foster6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMara Orchard / Shanna Peterson vs Stephanie Elliott / Trina Jones4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesErin Heltshe vs Valerie Martin6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Zhong / Kelly Franco vs Cynthia Frederick / Mary Shugrue0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-03vs RHCC BLUEWon 41
W#1 DoublesEmily Adams / Nancy Zhong vs Taryn Petri / Madigan Petri6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHilary Navy vs Jennifer Curtis-Jones6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErin Heltshe / Kristin Nelson vs Erin Jackman / Tiffany Skiles7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJJ Wagner vs Heidi Wendling6-3, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShanna Peterson / Mara Orchard vs Kari Eckert / Emilee Noyes3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-24vs HIW MAROONLost 23
L#1 DoublesKristin Nelson / Erin Heltshe vs Rhonda Wilson / Amanda Corrigan6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHilary Navy vs Jessie Pellant6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Escobar / Emily Adams vs Amanda Fuller Wellman / Kelly Cavin4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJJ Wagner vs Angela Appleby1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMara Orchard / Shanna Peterson vs Megan Curtiss / Jessica Fleck5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-19vs LTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristin Nelson / Shanna Peterson vs Judith McKinney / Barbara Nevins3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJJ Wagner vs Kristen Philbrook1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMelanie Escobar / Nancy Zhong vs Karen Noreyko / Kristine O'Brien7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErin Heltshe / Kelly Franco vs Karen Hyde / Betsy Duryea5-7, 6-7
2021-05-10vs LPTC GOLDWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristin Nelson / Melanie Escobar vs Katherine Ashley / Emma Tiernon3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Zhong vs Leigh Goerke6-3, 4-2
L#2 DoublesMara Orchard / Shanna Peterson vs Lesleigh Anderson / Elizabeth Robinson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHilary Navy vs Spring Merino6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJJ Wagner / Emily Adams vs Nicole Palaschak / Laura Coleman6-1, 6-0
2021-05-08vs HIW MAROONLost 23
L#1 DoublesKristin Nelson / Erin Heltshe vs Kelly Cavin / Rhonda Wilson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJJ Wagner vs Amanda Corrigan4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMara Orchard / Emily Adams vs Kelly Murphy / Madeline Schymanski3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNancy Zhong vs Amanda Fuller Wellman0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Escobar / Hilary Navy vs Jessica Fleck / Megan Curtiss3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-26vs NJ TEALLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Escobar / JJ Wagner vs Trina Jones / Valerie Martin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMara Orchard / Shanna Peterson vs Stephanie Elliott / Renee Weidemann1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Zhong / Kelly Franco vs Lisa Ritchie / Mary Shugrue1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hilary Navy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.32
Kristin Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.81
Nancy Zhong
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.74
JJ Wagner
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Erin Heltshe
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.65
Mara Orchard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Melanie Escobar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Shanna Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Heltshe + JJ Wagner4254% games+8.3% vs expected
Melanie Escobar + JJ Wagner7847% games+3.7% vs expected
Erin Heltshe + Mara Orchard71249% games+1.4% vs expected
Melanie Escobar + Nancy Zhong3251% games−2.8% vs expected
Shanna Peterson + Mara Orchard1838% games−3.2% vs expected
Melanie Escobar + Mara Orchard213 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Escobar + Hilary Navy303 matchesnot enough data
Erin Heltshe + Kristin Nelson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hilary Navy
31W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Nelson
115W–102L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
Nancy Zhong
32W–19L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
JJ Wagner
68W–56L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Erin Heltshe
42W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Mara Orchard
41W–43L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Melanie Escobar
53W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
Shanna Peterson
1W–10L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.