Teams

PD40/Weinberg/PTC

2026 STA Adult Combo 40 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 5.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 13 5:30 PM
Dr. Eddie Floyd Florence Tennis Center
2026-08-30vs PD40/Askins/HCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarsha Warren / Jenny Thigpen vs Jane Ponder / Jennifer Webb5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharlyne Battle / Myra Rivera vs Allyne Askins / Vanessa Wilhelm1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-23vs PD40/Askins/HCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesBonnie Disney / Jean Mcintosh vs Jennifer Webb / Barbara Lee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelvina Chappell / Nicole Swinehart vs Allyne Askins / Vanessa Wilhelm1-6, 5-7
2026-08-09vs PD40/Perkins/FTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesBonnie Disney / Jean Mcintosh vs Melissa Boyer / Teresa Cheng6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Weinberg / Marsha Warren vs Lorraine Tindal / Rocio Perez5-7, 0-2
L#3 DoublesSharlyne Battle / Carla Alston vs Julia Rowland / Brandi Davis2-6, 2-6
2026-08-02vs PD40/Askins/HCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Cody / Myra Rivera vs Deborah Griggs / Jennifer Webb4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Froman / Melvina Chappell vs Elizabeth Hubbard / Terrie Reames2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandy Trexler / Jasmine Burks vs Vanessa Wilhelm / Barbara Lee3-6, 6-7
2026-07-19vs PD40/Perkins/FTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBonnie Disney / Olga Pak vs Ning Wharton / Alexandra Ridgeway1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelvina Chappell / Marsha Warren vs Teresa Cheng / Maria Wells4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Trexler / Myra Rivera vs Deborah Bailey / Rocio Perez5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Women - 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD40/Askins/HCC1124861
2PD40/Weinberg/PTC032715104

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Pamela Cody
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.82
Pamela Weinberg
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Sandy Trexler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Melvina Chappell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Jean Mcintosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Marsha Warren
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Bonnie Disney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Jenny Thigpen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Sharlyne Battle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Carla Alston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Myra Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.96
Cindy Froman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.95
Nicole Swinehart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.93
Olga Pak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jasmine Burks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melvina Chappell + Jean Mcintosh2347% games+1.9% vs expected
Pamela Weinberg + Pamela Cody16462% games−2.4% vs expected
Jean Mcintosh + Bonnie Disney1443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Cody
45W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Pamela Weinberg
39W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Sandy Trexler
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Melvina Chappell
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jean Mcintosh
9W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Marsha Warren
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
Bonnie Disney
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Jenny Thigpen
8W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Sharlyne Battle
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Carla Alston
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Myra Rivera
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Cindy Froman
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Nicole Swinehart
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Olga Pak
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Jasmine Burks
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.