Teams

PD40/Perkins/FTC

2026 STA Adult Combo 40 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 5.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 13 5:30 PM
Dr. Eddie Floyd Florence Tennis Center
Sep 27 5:30 PM
Hartsville Country Club
2026-08-24vs PD40/Askins/HCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesNing Wharton / Melissa Boyer vs Allyne Askins / Vanessa Wilhelm6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulieanne Yarnal / Pamela Richardson vs Jennifer Webb / Jane Ponder5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLorraine Tindal / Alexandra Ridgeway vs Betsy Kraus / Anita Crawford6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-09vs PD40/Weinberg/PTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Boyer / Teresa Cheng vs Bonnie Disney / Jean Mcintosh3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLorraine Tindal / Rocio Perez vs Pamela Weinberg / Marsha Warren7-5, 2-0
W#3 DoublesJulia Rowland / Brandi Davis vs Sharlyne Battle / Carla Alston6-2, 6-2
2026-07-26vs PD40/Askins/HCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMisty Lee / Pamela Richardson vs Elizabeth Hubbard / Kathy Brown6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Anderson / Alexandra Ridgeway vs Barbara Lee / Jennifer Webb6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLorraine Tindal / Rocio Perez vs Anita Crawford / Betsy Kraus6-3, 6-4
2026-07-19vs PD40/Weinberg/PTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesNing Wharton / Alexandra Ridgeway vs Bonnie Disney / Olga Pak6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Cheng / Maria Wells vs Melvina Chappell / Marsha Warren6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Bailey / Rocio Perez vs Sandy Trexler / Myra Rivera7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Ning Wharton
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.02
Stacie Watford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Teresa Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Lorraine Tindal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Brandi Davis
published 3
2.81
Julieanne Yarnal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Misty Lee
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.72
Melissa Boyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Deborah Bailey
published 3
2.68
Kristen Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Maria Wells
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Alexandra Ridgeway
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.36
Julia Rowland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Rocio Perez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pamela Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Tindal + Teresa Cheng5061% games+6.1% vs expected
Maria Wells + Melissa Boyer3256% games+3.9% vs expected
Kristen Perkins + Stacie Watford123 matchesnot enough data
Lorraine Tindal + Rocio Perez213 matchesnot enough data
Brandi Davis + Misty Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Cheng + Ning Wharton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ning Wharton
54W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
Stacie Watford
19W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Teresa Cheng
29W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Lorraine Tindal
26W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Brandi Davis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Julieanne Yarnal
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Misty Lee
31W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Melissa Boyer
22W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Deborah Bailey
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Kristen Perkins
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Maria Wells
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Alexandra Ridgeway
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Julia Rowland
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.36
Rocio Perez
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.26
Pamela Richardson
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.