Teams

SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ Filicia

2021 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Summer - SDNC · SDNC - 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesRobert Lozano / Danna Dickson vs Ross Watkins / Amie Destremps6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-08-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesBill Sudlow / Edna Mattei vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMichael Vaughan / Danna Dickson vs Jenny McGowan / Michael McGowan2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBill Sudlow / Rebekah Seidel vs Sally Schimmel / James Pennington2-6, 4-6
2021-07-10vs SDNC LLW 7.0 RBS&TC/ MaddenLost 02
L#2 DoublesBill Sudlow / Edna Mattei vs Vinh Dang / Yekaterina Smotrich4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Vaughan / Danna Dickson vs Wayne Klusmeier / Sun Lee3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEdna Mattei / Bill Sudlow vs Ann Ortel / Christopher Baker6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEdna Mattei / Bill Sudlow vs Nancy Picunko / Douglas Lee2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-05vs SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ SchrottLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdna Mattei / Jay Schram vs Oliver Petersen / Junli Feng6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanna Dickson / Michael Vaughan vs Robyn Rice / Tim Miller7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Robert Lozano
published
3.50
Edna Mattei
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.39
Jim Filicia
published 3.5
3.36
Danna Dickson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Bruce Danielson
published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Atkinson
published
3.20
Bill Sudlow
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Rebekah Seidel
published
2.87
Phillip Schneider
published
2.73
Eileen Gonzalez
published 3
2.68
Elizabeth Li
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Atkinson + Bruce Danielson11259% games+15.5% vs expected
Edna Mattei + Bill Sudlow4555% gamesnot enough data
Jim Filicia + Danna Dickson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Lozano
1W–11L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Edna Mattei
45W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Jim Filicia
108W–90L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Danna Dickson
47W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Bruce Danielson
16W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Michelle Atkinson
17W–7L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Bill Sudlow
53W–108L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Rebekah Seidel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.07
Phillip Schneider
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Eileen Gonzalez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elizabeth Li
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.