Teams

SPANISH OAKS #1

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 8.0 MEN- 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-06-20vs DRAGONRIDGE CC #1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDino Mendicino / Jerry Pruitt vs Larry Ladd / Joseph DeMilliano1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEnrico Litterini / Robert Roig vs Martin Mitchell / Kevin Wogalter3-6, 4-6
2021-06-13vs SPANISH OAKS #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDino Mendicino / Scott Paull vs John Rodrigues / Steve Stewart2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEnrico Litterini / Lee Robinson vs Bruce Willson / Michael Monroe3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-05-23vs DRAGONRIDGE CC #2Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott Paull / Stephen Newell vs Richard Reiter / David Schlatter6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-16vs CANYON GATESplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Roig / Scott Paull vs Roger Watson / Lawrence Anspach6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDino Mendicino / Rocky Johnson vs Algirdas Leskys / Dan Adamson3-6, 5-7
2021-05-09vs WHITNEY MESA PARKSplit 11
L#2 DoublesScott Paull / Stephen Newell vs Richard Vandermark / Steven Hanson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJames Santos / Robert Roig vs Michael Ivy / Jim Roulias6-3, 6-2
2021-05-02vs DTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Newell / Scott Paull vs Kenneth Le / John Schwikert1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDino Mendicino / James Santos vs Jeff Girmus / Chris Stimson1-6, 3-6
2021-04-25vs DRAGONRIDGE CC #1Split 11
L#1 DoublesRobert Roig / Dino Mendicino vs Sandy Milmeister / Martin Mitchell2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJames Santos / Scott Paull vs Joseph DeMilliano / Kevin Wogalter1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-18vs SPANISH OAKS #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Roig / Lee Robinson vs John Rodrigues / Bruce Willson6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDino Mendicino / Scott Paull vs Rick Holden / Steven McCrary3-6, 3-6
2021-03-28vs DRAGONRIDGE CC #2Split 11
W#1 DoublesScott Paull / Robert Roig vs Onidio Mirabal / Richard Reiter6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEnrico Litterini / Jerry Pruitt vs Frank Seo / Patrick Hicks3-6, 0-6
2021-03-21vs CANYON GATELost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Paull / Stephen Newell vs Jeff Ng / Roger Piepenbrink3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEnrico Litterini / Dino Mendicino vs Bill Oakley / Roger Watson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-03-14vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 21
W#1 DoublesRocky Johnson / Robert Roig vs Anthony Taeubel / Jim Roulias6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Paull / Stephen Newell vs Richard Vandermark / Steven Hanson2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEnrico Litterini / Dino Mendicino vs Michael Ivy / Rick Jacoby6-1, 6-3
2021-03-07vs DTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Paull / Robert Roig vs Kenneth Le / Efstathios Potamitis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEnrico Litterini / Rocky Johnson vs Michael Villani / John Schwikert2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 MEN- 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SPANISH OAKS #275201634306
2SPANISH OAKS #139122452357

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Lee Robinson
published
3.33
Scott Paull
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
Dino Mendicino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
James Santos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Enrico Litterini
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Robert Roig
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Rocky Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Newell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dino Mendicino + Robert Roig5158% games+9.7% vs expected
Scott Paull + Robert Roig6452% games+8.5% vs expected
Robert Roig + James Santos8167% games+7.8% vs expected
Robert Roig + Enrico Litterini9454% games+2.4% vs expected
Scott Paull + Enrico Litterini2343% games+2.0% vs expected
Dino Mendicino + Enrico Litterini51049% games−0.1% vs expected
Scott Paull + Dino Mendicino01136% games−3.4% vs expected
Dino Mendicino + Stephen Newell3845% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Robinson
22W–96L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.48
3.5
Scott Paull
51W–111L career · 11 lines in 2021
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Dino Mendicino
79W–105L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
James Santos
49W–36L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Enrico Litterini
81W–86L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Roig
128W–92L career · 15 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rocky Johnson
10W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Newell
32W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.