← Search

Enrico Litterini

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
167 matches · 81W–86L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Enrico Litterini to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
2023-05-07 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
David Bickmore / Michael Monroe
2023-04-30 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dennis Wertzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-23 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
Kenneth Le / Mark Smith
2023-04-02 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Paull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-26 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darin McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-19 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Mulopulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2023-02-25 · SPANISH OAKS #3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Roig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-02-18 · SPANISH OAKS #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Paull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-02-11 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-11 · SPANISH OAKS #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2023-01-21 · SPANISH OAKS #3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-22 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jabo Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
63.1%
41W–24L · 56.3% of games
4.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 43.2% of games
7.0
100%
13W–0L · 65.4% of games
8.0
10.3%
3W–26L · 36.9% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Male Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova