Teams

Christensen & Cortese - Lifetime

2022 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-07vs Lu & Graf - GenesisLost 04
L#1 DoublesJulie Kuhlers / Sophie Schmidt vs Christine Halbrook / Corinne Goode3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTeri Everett / Linda Wilker vs Sarah Graf / Shirley Weuve1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesUsicha Marchant vs Dionne Richards3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Champion / Diane Cortese vs Jennifer Corkrean / Val Hoefle2-6, 2-6
2022-04-23vs IA/VanVark & Cownie/18&Over3.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan Christensen / Teri Everett vs Christy Cownie / Michelle Cownie4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Graves vs Keaton Pulver4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Wiarda / Julie Kuhlers vs Renee Oiler / Candy Vandewater6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Cortese / Usicha Marchant vs Jannelle McGee / Stephanie Anania3-6, 2-6
2022-04-02vs Baddeloo & Mullin - DMGolfSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnn Mincks / Amy Guthrie vs Sharon Dinshaw / Katie Ward1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Christensen / Michelle Champion vs Janice Koder / Cindy Baddeloo6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Graves vs Mary Everett6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTeri Everett / Brenda Wiarda vs Jenna Steffensmeier / Brenda Klein0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-02-26vs IA/VanVark & Cownie/18&Over3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Mincks / Sophie Schmidt vs Michelle Cownie / Candy Vandewater2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Christensen / Teri Everett vs Christy Cownie / Megan Beebe6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJulie Kuhlers / Usicha Marchant vs Jessica Scuffham / Jannelle McGee4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-02-12vs Lu & Graf - GenesisLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Piziali / Ann Mincks vs Christine Halbrook / Jennifer Corkrean6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Christensen / Julie Kuhlers vs Dionne Richards / Shirley Weuve0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLinda Wilker / Usicha Marchant vs Susmita Sura / Val Hoefle2-6, 3-6
2022-01-22vs Baddeloo & Mullin - DMGolfSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSarah Piziali / Ann Mincks vs Sharon Dinshaw / Michelle Mullin6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichelle Champion / Teri Everett vs Cindy Baddeloo / Katie Ward5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Graves vs Gaylyn Markowski4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Wilker / Usicha Marchant vs Brenda Klein / Jennifer Aldrich6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Langdon & Wiley5121924218
2IA/VanVark & Cownie/18&Over3.0W4221924238
3Lu & Graf - Genesis42181228274
4Jenkins & Wichhart - NDAC33141636265
5Christensen & Cortese - Lifetime33102043302
6Baddeloo & Mullin - DMGolf15111941295
7Eells & Callahan - Elmcrest15102044310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Ann Mincks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Sophie Schmidt
published
2.96
Sarah Piziali
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brenda Wiarda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Linda Wilker
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.58
Teri Everett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.46
Michelle Champion
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Diane Cortese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Julie Kuhlers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Suzanne Graves
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Usicha Marchant
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Piziali + Ann Mincks5167% games+15.8% vs expected
Michelle Champion + Linda Wilker2638% games−8.5% vs expected
Teri Everett + Michelle Champion134 matchesnot enough data
Teri Everett + Linda Wilker224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Christensen + Teri Everett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Mincks
45W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Sophie Schmidt
46W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Sarah Piziali
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Brenda Wiarda
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Wilker
23W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Teri Everett
14W–32L career · 8 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Michelle Champion
9W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Diane Cortese
6W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Kuhlers
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Christensen
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Graves
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Usicha Marchant
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.