Teams

Eells & Callahan - Elmcrest

2022 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-14vs Jenkins & Wichhart - NDACLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Ehrhardt / Linda Wiley vs Penny Raia / Jeniece Nott6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulie Kramer vs Sarah Franje3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristine McLaughlin / Amy Worden vs Sadhna Jani / Sonja Smith6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-23vs Langdon & WileySplit 22
W#1 DoublesDebra Callahan / Emily Ehrhardt vs JENNIFER HEBERT / Elizabeth Ekberg6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJulie Golding vs Jennifer Kemmerer6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Worden / Laurie Mead vs Erin Langdon / Manny Meyers4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Lewis / Kathy Keel Moeder vs Lyla Schweiger / Lydia Brown4-6, 5-7
2022-04-09vs Jenkins & Wichhart - NDACWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Lewis / Linda Wiley vs Brenda Wichhart / Jeniece Nott1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Golding vs Sarah Franje6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAmy Worden vs Emelyn Harris6-2, 7-5
2022-03-26vs Langdon & WileyWon 32
L#1 DoublesDebra Callahan / Linda Wiley vs Sally Wiley / Elizabeth Ekberg4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Golding vs JENNIFER HEBERT7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindy Christensen / Laurie Mead vs Jenny Skogman / Carol Renz6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJulie Kramer vs Michelle Novak3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Rigdon / Amy Worden vs Rochelle Galbraith / Lydia Brown6-0, 6-0
2022-02-12vs Jenkins & Wichhart - NDACLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Ehrhardt / Kathy Keel Moeder vs Carla Schmidt / Kathy Jenkins7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJodi Cobb vs Sarah Franje2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Wiley / Julie Kramer vs Penny Raia / Sonja Smith5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindy Christensen / Christine McLaughlin vs Brenda Wichhart / Nichole Early6-7, 4-6
2022-01-15vs Langdon & WileyLost 05
L#1 DoublesLinda Wiley / Debra Callahan vs JENNIFER HEBERT / Sandra Monahan4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Ervin vs Jennifer Kemmerer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Mead / Christine McLaughlin vs Carol Renz / Elizabeth Ekberg2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJulie Kramer vs Michelle Novak3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Lewis / Rachel Rigdon vs Lyla Schweiger / Sorina Abernathey3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Langdon & Wiley5121924218
2IA/VanVark & Cownie/18&Over3.0W4221924238
3Lu & Graf - Genesis42181228274
4Jenkins & Wichhart - NDAC33141636265
5Christensen & Cortese - Lifetime33102043302
6Baddeloo & Mullin - DMGolf15111941295
7Eells & Callahan - Elmcrest15102044310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Julie Golding
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.20
Jodi Cobb
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.13
Debra Callahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Holly Ervin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Kathy Keel Moeder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Amy Worden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Julie Kramer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Laurie Mead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Christine McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Linda Wiley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lindy Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Rigdon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Mead + Lindy Christensen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Golding
19W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jodi Cobb
29W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Debra Callahan
19W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Holly Ervin
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Kathy Keel Moeder
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Amy Worden
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Kramer
5W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
Laurie Mead
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Christine McLaughlin
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Linda Wiley
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindy Christensen
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Rigdon
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.