Teams

Vivante - Corliss

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 50 & Over Fall Day · 7.5 W Monday Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesAgnes O'Connor / Lori Davila vs Valerie Lansdale / Martha Gadowry6-2, 6-4
2025-11-17vs Babcock - RevisWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Colleen Larson vs Samantha Edwards / Karen Moss2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Crews / Nan Faciszewski vs Karen Nuthals / Linda Revis6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Head / Lorraine Heckman Schmidt vs Theresa Raker / Dale Arroyo6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPenny Henkel / Agnes O'Connor vs Sheri Posluszny / Charlotte Hartman7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-27vs Babcock - RevisLost 01
L#1 DoublesAgnes O'Connor / Karen Corliss vs Sharon McCaw / Dale Arroyo3-6, 4-6
2025-10-13vs Fall Winner/Seminole Lakes - MayerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAgnes O'Connor / Karen Corliss vs Valerie Lansdale / Cathy Hysell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Monday Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Diane Crews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Agnes O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.29
Barbara Robinson
published 3.5
Colleen Larson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Penny Henkel
published
Jane Kerstetter
published
Janet Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeannine Holway
published
Karen Corliss
published
Kathleen Head
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Davila
published
Lorraine Heckman Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Elmore
published
Nan Faciszewski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Murno
published
Rose Stivers
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Agnes O'Connor
34W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Barbara Robinson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Colleen Larson
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Penny Henkel
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jane Kerstetter
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeannine Holway
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Corliss
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Head
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lori Davila
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorraine Heckman Schmidt
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Elmore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nan Faciszewski
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Renee Murno
78W–48L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rose Stivers
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.