Teams

Babcock - Revis

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 50 & Over Fall Day · 7.5 W Monday Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-19vs Vivante - CorlissLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim McCartney / Mary Bartholomew vs Renee Murno / Nan Faciszewski3-6, 6-7
2025-11-17vs Vivante - CorlissLost 12
W#1 DoublesSamantha Edwards / Karen Moss vs Janet Kramer / Colleen Larson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Nuthals / Linda Revis vs Diane Crews / Nan Faciszewski3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTheresa Raker / Dale Arroyo vs Kathleen Head / Lorraine Heckman Schmidt3-6, 3-6
2025-11-10vs Fall Winner/Seminole Lakes - MayerLost 01
L#2 DoublesNannette Cassidy / Kim McCartney vs Teresa Mayer / Sheri Posluszny7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-27vs Vivante - CorlissWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim McCartney / Nannette Cassidy vs Jane Kerstetter / Colleen Larson6-0, 6-3
2025-10-20vs Fall Winner/Seminole Lakes - MayerLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim McCartney / Nannette Cassidy vs Petra Klos / Deanna Williams7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-06vs Vivante - CorlissWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim McCartney / Christina Zimmerman vs Kathleen Head / Barbara Robinson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Moss / Kim McCartney vs Valerie Lansdale / Cathy Hysell1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Monday Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Samantha Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Andrea Petersen
published 4
3.27
Christina Zimmerman
published 3.5
3.26
Shelley Marcus
published
Dale Arroyo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Karen Moss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Karen Nuthals
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Linda Revis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Heather Intress
published
3.06
Theresa Raker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Jean Gehrig
published
2.96
Mary Bartholomew
published
Kim McCartney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Nannette Cassidy
published
Sharon McCaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Marcus + Karen Moss3443% games−1.9% vs expected
Shelley Marcus + Kim McCartney6252% gamesnot enough data
Sharon McCaw + Karen Moss314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Moss + Samantha Edwards213 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Raker + Heather Intress213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Edwards
66W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Andrea Petersen
18W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Christina Zimmerman
34W–26L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Shelley Marcus
29W–24L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Dale Arroyo
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen Moss
14W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Karen Nuthals
8W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Linda Revis
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Heather Intress
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Theresa Raker
23W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Jean Gehrig
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Mary Bartholomew
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Kim McCartney
29W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nannette Cassidy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon McCaw
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.