Teams

Double Dare

2026 Corpus Christi 55 & Over USTA League · Ladies 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-24vs Wild WomenLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Garcia / Michelle Shircliffe vs Kristi Cartwright / Lauri Hefte0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Morales / Rhonda Brown vs Miriam Madrid / Juanita Garza5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGrace Hammack / Elizabeth Loveland vs Kathleen Ellsworth / Gabriela Dalton3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-17vs 55 ShadesWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Clark / Teresa Morales vs Jane Huston / Jennifer Maingot4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Aitken / Rhonda Brown vs Ginny Bell / Romy Brewer6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Garcia / Michelle Shircliffe vs Nadalin Sarchet / Ann Swanson6-0, 6-0
2026-03-03vs Wild WomenWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Brown / Catherine Clark vs Juanita Garza / Bridie Wong6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Garcia / Michelle Shircliffe vs Kristi Cartwright / Lauri Hefte6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesToni Barrera / Grace Hammack vs Miriam Madrid / Cheri Riley7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-24vs 55 ShadesLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Garcia / Michelle Shircliffe vs Vicki Jamison / Cathy McCoy6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRhonda Brown / Catherine Clark vs Jane Huston / Jennifer Maingot4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesToni Barrera / Elizabeth Loveland vs Nadalin Sarchet / Jeanie Szmanda3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Ladies 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wild Women31849100
2Double Dare226614104
355 Shades134817128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Michelle Shircliffe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Rhonda Brown
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Patricia Aitken
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Elizabeth Loveland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Teresa Morales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Toni Barrera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Grace Hammack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Aurora Robles
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Shircliffe
45W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Rhonda Brown
34W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Patricia Aitken
15W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Elizabeth Loveland
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Teresa Morales
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Toni Barrera
22W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Grace Hammack
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Aurora Robles
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.