Teams

55 Shades

2026 Corpus Christi 55 & Over USTA League · Ladies 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-17vs Double DareLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Huston / Jennifer Maingot vs Catherine Clark / Teresa Morales6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGinny Bell / Romy Brewer vs Patricia Aitken / Rhonda Brown0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNadalin Sarchet / Ann Swanson vs Lisa Garcia / Michelle Shircliffe0-6, 0-6
2026-03-10vs Wild WomenLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynne Lassig / Romy Brewer vs Lauri Hefte / Kristi Cartwright2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMargot Hopkins / Jennifer Maingot vs Cheri Riley / Gabriela Dalton7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGinny Bell / Ann Swanson vs Bridie Wong / Mary Deeann Gabro1-6, 2-6
2026-02-24vs Double DareWon 21
L#1 DoublesVicki Jamison / Cathy McCoy vs Lisa Garcia / Michelle Shircliffe1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJane Huston / Jennifer Maingot vs Rhonda Brown / Catherine Clark6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNadalin Sarchet / Jeanie Szmanda vs Toni Barrera / Elizabeth Loveland6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-17vs Wild WomenLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatsy Padron / Jeanie Szmanda vs Kristi Cartwright / Lauri Hefte3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMargot Hopkins / Romy Brewer vs Cheri Riley / Miriam Madrid1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCathy McCoy / Vicki Jamison vs Kathleen Ellsworth / Gabriela Dalton1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Ladies 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wild Women31849100
2Double Dare226614104
355 Shades134817128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jane Huston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Patsy Padron
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Jennifer Maingot
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Vicki Jamison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Jeanie Szmanda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Nadalin Sarchet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Lynne Lassig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Margot Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Cathy McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Romy Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Ginny Bell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Maingot + Margot Hopkins9752% games−0.3% vs expected
Vicki Jamison + Jeanie Szmanda2643% games−2.1% vs expected
Jennifer Maingot + Vicki Jamison314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Maingot + Jane Huston314 matchesnot enough data
Vicki Jamison + Romy Brewer224 matchesnot enough data
Nadalin Sarchet + Romy Brewer314 matchesnot enough data
Patsy Padron + Jane Huston224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanie Szmanda + Jane Huston404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Huston
56W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Patsy Padron
32W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jennifer Maingot
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Vicki Jamison
53W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Jeanie Szmanda
78W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Nadalin Sarchet
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lynne Lassig
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Margot Hopkins
33W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Cathy McCoy
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Romy Brewer
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Ginny Bell
8W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.