Teams

Kingman/Hogue/Nashville

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - TUES AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-01vs Osborne/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Farrow / Kelly Stanley vs Emma Anderson / Melissa Carla Grillo6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGrace Hogue / Ryan Sedlacek vs Erin Obrien / Mitsuyo Suzuki6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelsey Wilmore / Ellen Hollis vs Brooke Prince / Brooke Shuster6-0, 6-0
2026-08-25vs Bailey/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Hogue / Kelsey Wilmore vs Ashley Johnson / Lauren McLaughlin7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGrace Hogue / Sarah Enstice vs Leslie Willmore / Jennifer Miller7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebekah Carroll / Brooke Riebeling vs Meredith Smith / Lauren Tanner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-18vs Vogel/Jett/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Kingman / Lauren Hocker vs Marcy Burridge / Laura Burk2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Hogue / Suzanne Lawing vs Candice Hall / Grace Bryan6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Beth Scott / Kelly Stanley vs Paige Bacon / Blaire Jett4-6, 2-6
2026-08-11vs Schneider/Vestevich/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Hocker / Lauren Kingman vs Suzanne Smothers / Amanda Ricciardi4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGrace Hogue / Sarah Enstice vs Becky Schneider / Jenny Stoebner6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Lawing / Ryan Sedlacek vs Elisa Goodrich / Carey Peek2-6, 4-6
2026-08-04vs Arla/McMurtray/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebekah Carroll / Brooke Riebeling vs Christy Briggs / Lluvia Contaldo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelsey Wilmore / Lauren Kingman vs Kelly Cole / Anne Budelier6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNicole Hogue / Grace Hogue vs Preeti Arla / Erin McMurtray4-6, 5-7
2026-07-28vs Osborne/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Enstice / Grace Hogue vs Meredith Gilbertson / Mitsuyo Suzuki6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Kingman / Lauren Hocker vs Sarah Fairbank / Katie Terry6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Stanley / Sara Beth Scott vs Anne Smith / Glenda Dahlhauser6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - TUES AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Paige Adair
published
3.24
Grace Hogue
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Kelsey Wilmore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Sarah Enstice
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Kelly Stanley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Suzanne Lawing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Brooke Riebeling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.04
Rebekah Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Lauren Kingman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Ellen Hollis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jill Farrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Ryan Sedlacek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Nicole Hogue
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Sara Beth Scott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Lauren Hocker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Caroline Weigel
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Enstice + Grace Hogue5165% games+10.9% vs expected
Sara Beth Scott + Ryan Sedlacek3350% games+9.5% vs expected
Sara Beth Scott + Lauren Kingman6259% games+6.3% vs expected
Suzanne Lawing + Kelly Stanley3649% games+3.6% vs expected
Lauren Kingman + Ryan Sedlacek3442% games−4.0% vs expected
Suzanne Lawing + Lauren Hocker1434% games−7.8% vs expected
Lauren Kingman + Sarah Enstice314 matchesnot enough data
Grace Hogue + Kelsey Wilmore404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Adair
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Grace Hogue
35W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Kelsey Wilmore
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.14
Sarah Enstice
35W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Kelly Stanley
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.06
Suzanne Lawing
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Brooke Riebeling
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Rebekah Carroll
25W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Lauren Kingman
33W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Ellen Hollis
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Jill Farrow
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Ryan Sedlacek
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Nicole Hogue
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Sara Beth Scott
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.83
Lauren Hocker
20W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Caroline Weigel
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.