Teams

Vogel/Jett/Nashville

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - TUES AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-25vs Arla/McMurtray/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Vogel / NICOLE BATEMAN vs Christy Briggs / Lluvia Contaldo6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBlaire Jett / Laura Burk vs Preeti Arla / Anne Budelier6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarcy Burridge / Barbara Zwerner vs Debora Edkin / Kelsey Edmonds6-3, 6-3
2026-08-18vs Kingman/Hogue/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarcy Burridge / Laura Burk vs Lauren Kingman / Lauren Hocker6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCandice Hall / Grace Bryan vs Nicole Hogue / Suzanne Lawing1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaige Bacon / Blaire Jett vs Sara Beth Scott / Kelly Stanley6-4, 6-2
2026-08-11vs Bailey/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcy Burridge / Mckenzie Kleinhenz vs Ashley Johnson / Shelby Murphy4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Lubnik / NICOLE BATEMAN vs Jennifer Miller / Leslie Willmore3-6, 3-6
2026-08-04vs Osborne/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesBlaire Jett / Paige Bacon vs Jackie Osborne / Katie Terry6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Zwerner / Marcy Burridge vs Kelsey Bourff / Emma Anderson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGrace Bryan / Hannah Wright vs Anne Smith / Leslie DiNella6-1, 6-1
2026-07-28vs Schneider/Vestevich/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLibba Alden / Candice Hall vs Becky Schneider / Nobu Junge6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGrace Bryan / Hannah Wright vs Lissa Vestevich / Carey Peek6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - TUES AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Blaire Jett
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Marcy Burridge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Grace Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Laura Burk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Libba Alden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Victoria Lubnik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Candice Hall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
NICOLE BATEMAN
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Barbara Zwerner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Hannah Wright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Paige Bacon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Mckenzie Kleinhenz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcy Burridge + Blaire Jett7167% games+12.6% vs expected
Victoria Lubnik + NICOLE BATEMAN224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Burk + NICOLE BATEMAN404 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Zwerner + Marcy Burridge213 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Zwerner + NICOLE BATEMAN213 matchesnot enough data
Marcy Burridge + Libba Alden303 matchesnot enough data
NICOLE BATEMAN + Mckenzie Kleinhenz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blaire Jett
39W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Marcy Burridge
35W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Grace Bryan
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Laura Burk
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Libba Alden
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Victoria Lubnik
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Candice Hall
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
NICOLE BATEMAN
40W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Barbara Zwerner
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Hannah Wright
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
Paige Bacon
25W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.85
Mckenzie Kleinhenz
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.