Teams

Vintage Terminetters

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-08-26vs Vintage RacquettesLost 03
L#1 DoublesRene Williams / Susan Sherman vs Bonita Hanner / Linda Miller1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Gill / Patricia Hansen vs Cheryl Johnson / Vicky Kmetz2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Gorbett / Ginger Paige vs Alyson Hagy / Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal3-6, 0-6
2021-08-26vs Vintage RacquettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinger Paige / Cathy Gorbett vs Megan Hayes / Ellen Laubhan0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Peck / Susan Sherman vs Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Cheryl Johnson7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Francis / Rene Williams vs Alyson Hagy / Sharon Buccino1-6, 2-6
2021-08-25vs Vintage RacquettesLost 03
L#1 DoublesGinger Paige / Julie Francis vs Megan Hayes / Ellen Laubhan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Peck / Cathy Gorbett vs Bonita Hanner / Linda Miller4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia Hansen / Priscilla Gill vs Sharon Buccino / Vicky Kmetz2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cathy Gorbett
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Ginger Paige
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Patricia Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Priscilla Gill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Julie Francis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Peck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rene Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Hansen + Rene Williams3540% games−3.6% vs expected
Cathy Gorbett + Ginger Paige1437% games−5.7% vs expected
Patricia Hansen + Ginger Paige81142% games−10.1% vs expected
Patricia Hansen + Priscilla Gill033 matchesnot enough data
Rene Williams + Ginger Paige123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Gorbett
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ginger Paige
27W–57L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Patricia Hansen
26W–60L career · 2 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Priscilla Gill
36W–59L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
2.99
Julie Francis
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Peck
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rene Williams
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Sherman
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.