Teams

Vintage Racquettes

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-08-26vs Vintage TerminettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Hayes / Ellen Laubhan vs Ginger Paige / Cathy Gorbett6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Cheryl Johnson vs Nancy Peck / Susan Sherman5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAlyson Hagy / Sharon Buccino vs Julie Francis / Rene Williams6-1, 6-2
2021-08-26vs Vintage TerminettersWon 30
W#1 DoublesBonita Hanner / Linda Miller vs Rene Williams / Susan Sherman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Johnson / Vicky Kmetz vs Priscilla Gill / Patricia Hansen6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlyson Hagy / Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal vs Cathy Gorbett / Ginger Paige6-3, 6-0
2021-08-25vs Vintage TerminettersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Hayes / Ellen Laubhan vs Ginger Paige / Julie Francis6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBonita Hanner / Linda Miller vs Nancy Peck / Cathy Gorbett6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSharon Buccino / Vicky Kmetz vs Patricia Hansen / Priscilla Gill6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyson Hagy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Ellen Laubhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Vicky Kmetz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Bonita Hanner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Hayes
published
Sharon Buccino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Hayes + Ellen Laubhan8156% games+0.4% vs expected
Sharon Buccino + Ellen Laubhan4347% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Buccino + Alyson Hagy1649% gamesnot enough data
Alyson Hagy + Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal2448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alyson Hagy
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Ellen Laubhan
128W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Vicky Kmetz
38W–49L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Bonita Hanner
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Megan Hayes
14W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Buccino
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.