Teams

NFitzgerald (Springfield) Après Tennis

2023 Summer Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 3.5 Women; Daytime

4 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-27vs TSemones (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesKelly Treble / Maureen Paterson vs Traci Semones / Dawn VanHoy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-25vs CLapointe (Marvin Creek) CAPS teamLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesKelly Treble / Maureen Paterson vs Melissa Habegger / Caroline Lapointe2-6, 2-6
W#1 Female DoublesNatalie Fitzgerald / Amie Caudle vs Wendy Clendening / Julie Richardson6-3, 6-4
2023-06-28vs JHarrison (Carmel) Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMaureen Paterson / Amie Caudle vs SUSAN ALIOTA / Gina Arado6-1, 6-4
2023-06-26vs CRidley (Brookhaven) Over ServedWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesNatalie Fitzgerald / Maureen Paterson vs Claudia Ridley / Kate Merrill6-4, 6-3
2023-06-15vs BMarks (PCC) Ms. HitsWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesNatalie Fitzgerald / Amie Caudle vs Lisa Long / Elizabeth Rudder6-2, 6-2
2023-06-08vs IRapaglia (BCC) But First, TennisWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKelly Treble / Amie Caudle vs Irene Rapaglia / Michelle Lynch6-4, 6-1
2023-05-30vs EClapham (Life Time) TerminettersWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesNatalie Fitzgerald / Maureen Paterson vs Erin Clapham / Laura Difraia5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women; Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Kelly Treble
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Amie Caudle
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Maureen Paterson
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Natalie Fitzgerald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Treble + Amie Caudle8160% games+3.6% vs expected
Maureen Paterson + Kelly Treble2644% games−9.7% vs expected
Maureen Paterson + Amie Caudle6350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Treble
97W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Amie Caudle
175W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Maureen Paterson
83W–158L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Natalie Fitzgerald
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.