Teams

CRidley (Brookhaven) Over Served

2023 Summer Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 3.5 Women; Daytime

4 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-23vs JHarrison (Carmel) Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesVanessa Pomfrey / Claudia Ridley vs SUSAN ALIOTA / Erin Conklin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-17vs BMarks (PCC) Ms. HitsLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesErin Pacilli / Vanessa Pomfrey vs Brandi Marks / Lisa Long3-6, 0-6
2023-07-05vs EClapham (Life Time) TerminettersWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesVanessa Pomfrey / Claudia Ridley vs Priscilla Navarrete / Kristy Simmons7-5, 7-5
L#1 Female DoublesClaudia Ridley / Kate Merrill vs Natalie Fitzgerald / Maureen Paterson4-6, 3-6
2023-06-16vs MCollins/Holland (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesClaudia Ridley / Vanessa Pomfrey vs Mary Collins / Debra Holland6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 Female DoublesErin Pacilli / Claudia Ridley vs Kathleen Ciminelli / Rebecca Danguy6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women; Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Kate Merrill
published
3.10
Vanessa Pomfrey
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Claudia Ridley
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Erin Pacilli
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Pomfrey + Erin Pacilli4165% games+19.3% vs expected
Vanessa Pomfrey + Claudia Ridley11752% games+16.4% vs expected
Erin Pacilli + Claudia Ridley4160% games+14.4% vs expected
Kate Merrill + Claudia Ridley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Merrill
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Vanessa Pomfrey
83W–94L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Claudia Ridley
89W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Erin Pacilli
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.