Teams

Fixed Rate Forehands

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - POCATELLO · Men 4.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.30 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-19vs Tyler PincockWon 32
L#1 DoublesPhilip Jones / Steven Nielsen vs Kevin Harper / Tyler Pincock1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJustin Cannon vs Pierce Bolton3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBryson Smith / Russell Ward vs Jesse Salmon / Thomas Owens6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSeiji Wood vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBarry Smith / Daniel Spicer vs Sobhan Patnaik / Cory Robertson6-1, 6-4
2025-06-19vs Tyler PincockWon 32
L#1 DoublesBryson Smith / Russell Ward vs Kevin Harper / Tyler Pincock5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSeiji Wood vs Pierce Bolton4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarry Smith / Daniel Spicer vs Thomas Owens / Cory Robertson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJustin Cannon vs Jesse Salmon6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesThaddeus Hansen / Philip Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-10vs Tyler PincockLost 23
L#1 DoublesDaniel Spicer / Benjamin Ortman vs Kevin Harper / Tyler Pincock3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJustin Cannon vs Pierce Bolton6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarry Smith / Steven Nielsen vs Sobhan Patnaik / Christopher Pacis6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesCory Spicer vs Thomas Owens0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBryson Smith / Russell Ward vs David Pigott / Cory Robertson7-6, 7-6
2025-06-10vs Tyler PincockWon 32
W#1 DoublesBryson Smith / Benjamin Ortman vs Kevin Harper / Sobhan Patnaik6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDaniel Spicer vs Pierce Bolton6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRussell Ward / Cory Spicer vs Tyler Pincock / Cory Robertson7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJustin Cannon vs Christopher Pacis6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarry Smith / Steven Nielsen vs David Pigott / Thomas Owens4-6, 6-7
2025-05-21vs Tyler PincockLost 13
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Ortman / Daniel Spicer vs Tim Rarick / Kevin Harper3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBryson Smith vs Jesse Salmon2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Nielsen / Barry Smith vs Tyler Pincock / Cory Robertson6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRussell Ward / Philip Jones vs David Pigott / Thomas Owens4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-21vs Tyler PincockWon 41
W#1 DoublesBryson Smith / Daniel Spicer vs Kevin Harper / David Pigott5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBarry Smith vs Tim Rarick1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Nielsen / Benjamin Ortman vs Jesse Salmon / Thomas Owens6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesPhilip Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRussell Ward / Thaddeus Hansen vs Tyler Pincock / Cory Robertson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fixed Rate Forehands42171330264
2Tyler Pincock24131738304

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Daniel Spicer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
Benjamin Ortman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Bryson Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.14
Barry Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Steven Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Russell Ward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Thaddeus Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Seiji Wood
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.90
Cory Spicer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Philip Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Justin Cannon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Spicer + Barry Smith8264% games+8.8% vs expected
Bryson Smith + Barry Smith5357% games+3.6% vs expected
Thaddeus Hansen + Seiji Wood5064% games−1.1% vs expected
Cory Spicer + Thaddeus Hansen3355% games−4.7% vs expected
Steven Nielsen + Barry Smith11460% games−5.3% vs expected
Philip Jones + Seiji Wood8075% gamesnot enough data
Cory Spicer + Daniel Spicer4262% gamesnot enough data
Bryson Smith + Steven Nielsen3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Spicer
58W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Benjamin Ortman
25W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Bryson Smith
99W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Barry Smith
102W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Steven Nielsen
134W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Russell Ward
66W–44L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Thaddeus Hansen
62W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Seiji Wood
107W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Cory Spicer
68W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Philip Jones
157W–106L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
Justin Cannon
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.