Teams

LTFC RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.35 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs PRC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEmily Marle / Lisa Lash vs Lisa Wiggins / Keenan Young6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAdriana Sosa vs Christine Heimbuck1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Nelson / Soon Hee Kolrud vs Natalie Vickers / Wendy Mosley1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCortney Eisses / Jennifer Loehr vs Erica Westphal / Gina Lurie6-3, 6-2
2026-07-09vs CCV REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAdriana Sosa / Cortney Eisses vs Jill Filene / Hillary Biskner4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Else vs Debra Downum4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Marle / Jennifer Loehr vs Laura L Marturano / Melanie Weitzenfeld6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMelody Sattizahn / Soon Hee Kolrud vs Kristin Mccarty / Oxana Volodko5-7, 4-6
2026-07-02vs HV YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Lash / Jill Nelson vs Theresa Mehringer / Ashley Larson2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesErin Clark vs Jeannie Lindley3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Else / Melody Sattizahn vs Libby Palmer / Morgen Calgaard1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCortney Eisses / Jennifer Loehr vs Emily Muellenberg / Brooke Burdic6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-25vs HRCA-S PINKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCortney Eisses / Erin Clark vs Lisa Anderson / Susie McKenzie2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaura Else vs Lisa Santos3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiane Lopez / Melody Sattizahn vs Marie O'Neill / Naina Mackay6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAdriana Sosa / Jessica Field vs Kimberly Bevill / Ti Mougne6-4, 7-5
2026-06-18vs PCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAdriana Sosa / Erin Clark vs Betsey Vecchiarelli / Jessica Adkisson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaura Else vs Meagan Minshall4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Lash / Diane Lopez vs Susan Bennett / Sandra Liberati0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Field / Jennifer Loehr vs Sarah Fitzpatrick / Stacey Griffin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-11vs SS-LT NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Lash / Adriana Sosa vs Janet Swanson / Shivani Sharma7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Nelson / Melody Sattizahn vs Roberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErin Clark / Jennifer Loehr vs Karen Ramon / Susie Taylor3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-04vs HFII BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Lash / Emily Marle vs Lauren Landen / Molly Maxwell2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Else vs Chris Thulin2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Lopez / Jill Nelson vs Kim MacKendrick / Katie Ross2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAdriana Sosa / Erin Clark vs Cheryl Sanders / Tricia Tichota6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Emily Marle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Adriana Sosa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Soon Hee Kolrud
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Diane Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Laura Else
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.14
Melody Sattizahn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Lash
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Erin Clark
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Jill Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Jessica Field
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Jennifer Loehr
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Cortney Eisses
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Field + Adriana Sosa6457% games+11.1% vs expected
Cortney Eisses + Adriana Sosa9454% games+10.3% vs expected
Jennifer Loehr + Emily Marle10070% games+10.1% vs expected
Lisa Lash + Emily Marle6161% games+8.9% vs expected
Jessica Field + Cortney Eisses5356% games+5.9% vs expected
Diane Lopez + Soon Hee Kolrud4354% games+3.8% vs expected
Jill Nelson + Diane Lopez3349% games+0.6% vs expected
Melody Sattizahn + Jill Nelson71544% games−5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Marle
104W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Adriana Sosa
127W–64L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Soon Hee Kolrud
35W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Diane Lopez
50W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Laura Else
39W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Melody Sattizahn
78W–121L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Lisa Lash
102W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Erin Clark
113W–99L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jill Nelson
31W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Jessica Field
134W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Jennifer Loehr
70W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Cortney Eisses
40W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.