Teams

SS-LT NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs CCV REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Nelson / Tanya Koch vs Jill Filene / Melisa Coyle3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Taylor / Kristie Gill vs Hillary Biskner / Marne Melun5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker vs Melanie Weitzenfeld / Kassandra Hurley3-6, 3-6
2026-07-09vs HV YELLOWLost 04
L#1 DoublesKaren Ramon / Kristie Gill vs Sue Smith / Libby Palmer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKerinsa Mullins vs Morgen Calgaard4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Nelson / Susie Taylor vs Theresa Mehringer / Jeannie Lindley7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker vs Ann Mann / Ashley Larson3-6, 6-7
2026-07-02vs HRCA-S PINKLost 13
W#1 DoublesTanya Koch / Sarah Nelson vs Lisa Santos / Kimberly Bevill6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKaren Ramon vs Lisa Anderson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKerinsa Mullins / Shivani Sharma vs Marie O'Neill / Naina Mackay7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Kwilman / Janet Swanson vs Susie McKenzie / Ti Mougne4-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs PCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesShivani Sharma / Janet Swanson vs Meagan Minshall / Betsey Vecchiarelli1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRoberta Seifert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Nelson / Suzanne Kwilman vs Sarah Fitzpatrick / Sandra Liberati5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Ramon / Ellen Shoemaker vs Whitney Vaccari / Linda Marcum4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-18vs HFII BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesShivani Sharma / Tanya Koch vs Lauren Landen / Molly Maxwell6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKerinsa Mullins vs Tricia Tichota0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristie Gill / Janet Swanson vs Emily Zadvorny / Cheryl Sanders6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker vs Maren Plisko / Christine McCarthy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-11vs LTFC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Swanson / Shivani Sharma vs Lisa Lash / Adriana Sosa6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker vs Jill Nelson / Melody Sattizahn4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Ramon / Susie Taylor vs Erin Clark / Jennifer Loehr6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-04vs PRC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJanet Swanson / Shivani Sharma vs Natalie Vickers / Wendy Mosley6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKerinsa Mullins vs Megan Kendrick3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTanya Koch / Suzanne Kwilman vs Christie Dyer / Keenan Young6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Kristie Gill vs Gina Lurie / Cassandra Buckner6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Tanya Koch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Shivani Sharma
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Janet Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Kristie Gill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Kerinsa Mullins
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Heather McGinnis
published 3.5
3.02
Suzanne Kwilman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Karen Ramon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Susie Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Ellen Shoemaker
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Roberta Seifert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Swanson + Kristie Gill3649% games+5.1% vs expected
Suzanne Kwilman + Kristie Gill202149% games+1.9% vs expected
Janet Swanson + Shivani Sharma7452% games+0.2% vs expected
Roberta Seifert + Ellen Shoemaker173943% games−2.0% vs expected
Susie Taylor + Janet Swanson224043% games−4.4% vs expected
Karen Ramon + Kristie Gill0640% games−5.4% vs expected
Janet Swanson + Roberta Seifert2446% gamesnot enough data
Janet Swanson + Suzanne Kwilman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanya Koch
55W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Shivani Sharma
46W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Janet Swanson
59W–94L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Kristie Gill
78W–106L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
Kerinsa Mullins
18W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Heather McGinnis
80W–85L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Suzanne Kwilman
70W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Karen Ramon
42W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Susie Taylor
25W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Ellen Shoemaker
26W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Roberta Seifert
47W–101L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.