Teams

KY/LEX/Yates&Jones

2024 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over MIXED LEXINGTON · 3.5 SENIOR MIXED

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-31vs KY/LEX/MillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Diggins / Chris Tallon vs Kavonne B. Webb / Bradley Jones3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSienna Hooper / John Hansel vs Connie Bishop / Greg Higgins6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEmily Diehl / Charles Gray vs Susan Miller / Gregory Miller3-6, 4-6
2024-07-23vs KY/LEX/MillerLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Diggins / Chris Tallon vs Nancy Bailey / Gheorghe Ignat6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLola Baker / Huston Wells vs Ann Boone / Thomas Poskin4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Jones / Jeffrey Jones vs Susan Miller / Gregory Miller6-7, 1-6
2024-07-19vs KY/LEX/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesSienna Hooper / Mike Wilson vs Connie Bishop / Gregory Miller0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Wheatley / Jeffrey Jones vs Rena Baer / George Lang5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLola Baker / William McElwain vs Carmen Ignat / Gheorghe Ignat3-6, 0-6
2024-07-08vs KY/LEX/MillerLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Diehl / Mike Wilson vs Kavonne B. Webb / Bradley Jones6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Diggins / Patrick Hancock vs Karen Diggs / Gheorghe Ignat2-6, 3-6
2024-06-30vs KY/LEX/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrenda Oldfield / John Hansel vs Connie Bishop / Syd Egenhauser2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLola Baker / Richard Lane vs Susan Miller / Gregory Miller2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Jones / Jeffrey Jones vs Rena Baer / Greg Higgins4-6, 3-6
2024-06-19vs KY/LEX/MillerWon 21
W#1 DoublesSienna Hooper / John Hansel vs Nancy Bailey / Thomas Poskin6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Diehl / Mike Wilson vs Karen Diggs / Greg Higgins6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Wheatley / Charles Gray vs Ann Boone / George Lang1-6, 0-6
2024-06-13vs KY/LEX/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrenda Oldfield / John Hansel vs Rena Baer / George Lang5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Diggins / Patrick Hancock vs Carmen Ignat / Gheorghe Ignat7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Lane / Sienna Hooper vs Gregory Miller / Susan Miller0-6, 5-7
2024-06-06vs KY/LEX/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Diggins / Huston Wells vs Kavonne B. Webb / Thomas Poskin2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Wheatley / William McElwain vs Connie Bishop / Greg Higgins2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Jones / Jeffrey Jones vs Carmen Ignat / Gheorghe Ignat2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 SENIOR MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Yates&Jones1742042275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Emily Diehl
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Patrick Hancock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Chris Tallon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brenda Oldfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Mary Diggins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Lola Baker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Mike Wilson
published
3.00
Huston Wells
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
John Hansel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Denise Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Deborah Wheatley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kay Yates
published
Richard Lane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sienna Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
William McElwain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Diehl
99W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Patrick Hancock
42W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Chris Tallon
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Brenda Oldfield
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Diggins
20W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Lola Baker
10W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.14
Mike Wilson
6W–37L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Huston Wells
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
John Hansel
7W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Denise Jones
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Deborah Wheatley
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kay Yates
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Lane
11W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sienna Hooper
17W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
William McElwain
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.