Teams

WP RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs WP BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrian OMalley / Scott Bice vs Eric White / Warren Adams6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCharles Philp vs Daniel Pace7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Musser / Larry Doan vs David McMurtry / Alexander Linville2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Jeff Cornelius vs Philip Shapiro / David Raymes7-6, 6-0
2022-07-11vs SSH BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Brian OMalley vs Matthew Bruff / Hector Trevino2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPeter Ericson vs Oliver Thurman6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeremy Mayer / Scott Bice vs Ben Atlee / Chip Hudson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Doan / Jeff Cornelius vs Jeff Cline / Josh Dougan2-6, 4-6
2022-07-04vs CACM BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Charles Philp vs Todd Harrington / Craig Stromberg1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPeter Ericson vs Scott Justus7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeremy Mayer / Daniel Green vs Bob Lees / Adam Smith6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesScott Bice / Larry Doan vs Adam Huff / W Hancock4-6, 3-6
2022-06-27vs ATC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesScott Bice / Larry Doan vs Huntington Walker / John Speer6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCharles Philp vs Zachary Bishop1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Jonathan Musser vs Randy Swenson / Jim Chrisman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTy Bartels / Jeff Cornelius vs Matthew Domich / Todd Groth7-6, 0-0
2022-06-20vs LTFC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Brian OMalley vs Todd Berich / Doug Arnold6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCharles Philp vs Gregory Nelson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJonathan Musser / Ty Bartels vs Joe Pascucci / Kristopher Hart7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDaniel Green / Peter Ericson vs Brett Shrewsbury / Scott Sagel6-1, 6-2
2022-06-13vs WP BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeff Cornelius / Larry Doan vs Eric White / Warren Adams2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Ericson vs David McMurtry6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrian OMalley / Jonathan Musser vs David Raymes / Alexander Linville6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeremy Mayer / Ralf Weizenbeck vs Philip Shapiro / David Stoler5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-06vs SSH BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian OMalley / Peter Ericson vs Benjamin Walker / Michael Gabora4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCharles Philp vs Jeffrey Todd2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Green / Scott Bice vs Matthew Bruff / Jeff Cline3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeremy Mayer / Jonathan Musser vs Jordan Jacob / Ben Atlee4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Daniel Green
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Charles Philp
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Jonathan Musser
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Peter Ericson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.04
Brian OMalley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.91
Andrew Baker
published 4
3.81
Scott Bice
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.73
Ralf Weizenbeck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Ty Bartels
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jeff Cornelius
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jeremy Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Larry Doan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Mayer + Ralf Weizenbeck3446% games+5.0% vs expected
Scott Bice + Jeremy Mayer5547% games+2.4% vs expected
Ralf Weizenbeck + Brian OMalley2337% games−9.2% vs expected
Scott Bice + Ralf Weizenbeck1533% games−11.8% vs expected
Ty Bartels + Scott Bice044 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Cornelius + Brian OMalley044 matchesnot enough data
Ty Bartels + Larry Doan213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Cornelius + Larry Doan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Green
54W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Charles Philp
17W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jonathan Musser
35W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
Peter Ericson
43W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Brian OMalley
18W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.04
4
Andrew Baker
30W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
Scott Bice
40W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Ralf Weizenbeck
43W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Ty Bartels
16W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jeff Cornelius
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeremy Mayer
16W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Larry Doan
21W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.