Teams

CACM BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs SSH BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesMichael Hallowell / W Hancock vs Andrew Banks / Bradford Winslow3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesScott Justus vs Oliver Thurman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAdam Smith / Todd Harrington vs Paul Whipple / Jeffrey Todd2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Pinkerton / Bob Lees vs Jordan Jacob / Sam Gompers2-6, 4-6
2022-07-11vs ATC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrington / Craig Stromberg vs Michael Donnelly / Zachary Bishop4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Hallowell vs David Eckelberger1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesW Hancock / Bob Lees vs Brett Fischer / Jim Chrisman2-6, 0-6
2022-07-04vs WP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrington / Craig Stromberg vs Ralf Weizenbeck / Charles Philp6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesScott Justus vs Peter Ericson5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBob Lees / Adam Smith vs Jeremy Mayer / Daniel Green2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAdam Huff / W Hancock vs Scott Bice / Larry Doan6-4, 6-3
2022-06-27vs LTFC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrington / Craig Stromberg vs Scott Sagel / Eric Wohl6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesScott Justus vs Scott Landen7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Pinkerton / Michael Hallowell vs Brett Shrewsbury / Gregory Nelson4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAdam Huff / W Hancock vs Joe Pascucci / Blair MacNeill6-4, 6-2
2022-06-20vs WP BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Justus / Craig Stromberg vs Daniel Pace / David Raymes3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Pinkerton / Michael Hallowell vs Raymond Jacobsohn / FRANCISCO AVELAR7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesW Hancock / Adam Huff vs Philip Shapiro / David McMurtry3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-06-13vs SSH BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Hallowell / Todd Harrington vs Jeff Cline / Josh Dougan3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesScott Justus vs Jeffrey Todd2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesW Hancock / Adam Huff vs Ben Atlee / Chip Hudson2-6, 2-6
2022-06-06vs ATC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBob Lees / Craig Stromberg vs Huntington Walker / Brett Fischer4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesScott Justus vs James Croney6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAdam Huff / W Hancock vs Thomas Williamson / Dan Slattery7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Pinkerton / Michael Hallowell vs Jim Chrisman / John Speer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
W Hancock
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.09
Scott Justus
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.85
Craig Stromberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Adam Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Bob Lees
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Michael Hallowell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Adam Huff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Brian Pinkerton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Todd Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hallowell + Brian Pinkerton2347% games+4.5% vs expected
W Hancock + Adam Huff91248% games+0.9% vs expected
Bob Lees + Adam Huff3451% games−3.5% vs expected
Brian Pinkerton + Adam Huff141848% games−4.8% vs expected
Adam Smith + Craig Stromberg12653% games−5.0% vs expected
Brian Pinkerton + Todd Harrington1639% games−6.5% vs expected
Bob Lees + Brian Pinkerton1438% games−10.9% vs expected
Michael Hallowell + Adam Huff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
W Hancock
44W–59L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
Scott Justus
45W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
4.09
4
Craig Stromberg
93W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Adam Smith
116W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Bob Lees
21W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Michael Hallowell
75W–58L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Adam Huff
53W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Brian Pinkerton
22W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
Todd Harrington
16W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.