Teams

OLYMPIC 18MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

28 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 25 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Julia Lokey
published
4.25
Clare Badaracco
published 4.5
4.16
Caitlin Beatty
published 4.5
4.09
David Law
published 4
4.08
Carolina O'Haren
published 4.5
4.03
Valerie Pietrasz
published
4.01
Lisa Lohre
published
4.01
Jennifer Dibble
published
4.00
Rebecca Belding
published
3.99
Karla Lovett
published
3.97
Katherine McCracken
published
3.93
Jeffrey Curtiss
published
3.81
Tracy Scruggs
published
3.78
Joe Gulash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
3.61
John Cella
published
3.60
Chris Slechta
published 4
3.45
Elizabeth Griffiths
published
3.45
Thomas Byrne
published
3.36
Julia Hemmendinger
published
3.36
Tom Yu
published
3.32
James Redfern
published
3.22
Thomas Boyce
published
3.18
Shan Bai
published
3.18
Turner Uppgren
published
Kayla Emmerson
published
Sai Madhavan
published
Sherry LaPorte
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Lokey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Clare Badaracco
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Caitlin Beatty
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
4
David Law
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.09
4.5
Carolina O'Haren
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Valerie Pietrasz
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Lisa Lohre
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
Jennifer Dibble
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Rebecca Belding
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
Karla Lovett
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Katherine McCracken
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
Jeffrey Curtiss
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.93
Tracy Scruggs
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Joe Gulash
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Schuyler Tilney-Volk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.76
John Cella
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
Chris Slechta
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Elizabeth Griffiths
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Thomas Byrne
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Julia Hemmendinger
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Tom Yu
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
James Redfern
23W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Thomas Boyce
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Shan Bai
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Turner Uppgren
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Kayla Emmerson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sai Madhavan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherry LaPorte
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.