Teams

SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ Manheim (2:2)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Katherine Nakamura6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Atkinson / Bobbie Manheim vs Anne Case / Krista Young3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJunli Feng / Beth Newton vs Tomoko Hoffman / Belinda Foley6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Atkinson / Bobbie Manheim vs Beth Mattfolk / Leanne Kiviharju6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-04Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Atkinson / Bobbie Manheim vs Koral Baumann / Paula Brust6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Katie Butler3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Amie Destremps6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathleen Kleinfeld / Bobbie Manheim vs Beth Piper / Tien Tran2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Newton / Junli Feng vs Leslie Dyerly / Sara Gil6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBeth Newton / Junli Feng vs Daniella Hartnett / Yolanda Christensen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Ashley Livingston6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Atkinson / Bobbie Manheim vs Elizabeth Dressel / Alena Khoroshansky1-6, 3-6
2022-01-25vs SDNC 3.5 RBCTC/ Nelson (2:2)Split 11
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Berkley Bowers6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBobbie Manheim / Margie Jones vs Mary Ann Neder / Judy Nelson4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesEdna Mattei vs Emily Adamiec6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBobbie Manheim / Michelle Atkinson vs Julia Simone / Bunny Shin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoberta Schrott / Junli Feng vs Junko Toda / Ryoko Adachi0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Edna Mattei
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.40
Margie Jones
published
3.38
Junli Feng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Christine Johnson
published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Atkinson
published
2.97
Bobbie Manheim
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.73
Eileen Gonzalez
published 3
2.68
Elizabeth Li
published 3
Patricia Malo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margie Jones + Michelle Atkinson4161% games+6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edna Mattei
45W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
Margie Jones
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Junli Feng
90W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Christine Johnson
45W–30L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Michelle Atkinson
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Bobbie Manheim
32W–65L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Eileen Gonzalez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elizabeth Li
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Patricia Malo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.