Teams

SDNC WC 3.5 Brengle Terrace / Reyes-Brisbin (3:1)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-18vs SDNC 3.5 La Costa/Zielinski (3:1)Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Dressel / Alena Khoroshansky vs Jennifer Waldron / Heather Collins6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Dressel / Alena Khoroshansky vs Florence Klein / Laney Mesquita6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Wooden / Victoria Abadilla vs Leslie Dyerly / Alicia Moran6-2, 6-2
2022-02-18vs SDNC 3.5 RBCTC/ Nelson (2:2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlena Khoroshansky / Elizabeth Dressel vs Mary Ann Neder / Cheryl Gans6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-11vs SDNC 3.5 Morgan Run/ Noet (2:2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlena Khoroshansky / Elizabeth Dressel vs Maeve Brick / Sandy Dielman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMercedes Cadiz / Karin Ward vs Alison Pasiut / Tomoko Hoffman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Dressel / Alena Khoroshansky vs Michelle Atkinson / Bobbie Manheim6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Dressel / Alena Khoroshansky vs Jan Hegstad / Debbie Furgal6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPhyllis Miller / Laura Wooden vs Tatiana Bourd / Elizabeth Fournier6-0, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAlena Khoroshansky / Yolanda Christensen vs Jennifer Benshoof / Karol Wong6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKarin Ward / Mercedes Cadiz vs Septembre Flannery / Nicole Holliday7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Wooden / Pam Pickering vs Sara Johnson / Colleen Lynn6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Karin Ward
published 4
3.74
Alena Khoroshansky
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.45
Jennifer Gilstrap
published
3.32
Elizabeth Dressel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Yolanda Christensen
published
3.25
Laura Wooden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mercedes Cadiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Dressel + Alena Khoroshansky10359% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karin Ward
72W–54L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Alena Khoroshansky
99W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Jennifer Gilstrap
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Elizabeth Dressel
42W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Yolanda Christensen
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Laura Wooden
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Mercedes Cadiz
55W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.