Teams

RBonello-DUR

2026 Eno River Tri-Level 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-13vs DAllen.T-DFCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanne Beckley / Cheryl Stevens vs Kyle Gouchoe-Hanas / Amy Johnston2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-30vs DAllen.T-DFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Grant / Shannon Lawrence vs Connie Kim / Kyle Gouchoe-Hanas6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah DeVore / Amy Strong vs Palen Mallory / Amy Johnston6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristi-Ann Wiltberger / Malinda Hain vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-23vs DAllen.T-DFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRoni Bonello / Maureen Sredl vs Connie Kim / Sharon Huang6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeanne Beckley / Amy Strong vs Susana Harvey / Nancy Draughon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecky King / Meredith Heath vs Diane Allen / Lindsey Wu7-5, 6-3
2026-06-16vs DAllen.T-DFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrook Holton Sheahan / Shannon Lawrence vs Amanda Lacoff / Connie Kim6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoelle Permutt / Cheryl Stevens vs Sarah Parker / Amy Johnston2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBecky King / Malinda Hain vs Diane Allen / Paige Giguere6-3, 6-2
2026-06-12vs DAllen.T-DFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Howard / Brook Holton Sheahan vs Amanda Lacoff / Sharon Huang4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoelle Permutt / Jeanne Beckley vs Sarah Parker / Amy Johnston6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMalinda Hain / Meredith Heath vs Paige Giguere / Diane Allen7-6, 6-4
2026-06-09vs DAllen.T-DFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Grant / Sara Howard vs Sharon Huang / Amanda Lacoff6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoelle Permutt / Amy Strong vs Amy Johnston / Taylor Harding6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeredith Heath / Christi-Ann Wiltberger vs Lindsey Wu / Diane Allen6-3, 6-4
2026-06-02vs DAllen.T-DFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRoni Bonello / Shannon Lawrence vs Amanda Lacoff / Connie Kim4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah DeVore / Cheryl Stevens vs Susana Harvey / Nancy Draughon3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesChristi-Ann Wiltberger / Becky King vs Palen Mallory / Diane Allen6-3, 6-2
2026-05-19vs DAllen.T-DFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Sredl / Sarah Grant vs Connie Kim / Amy Johnston6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Stevens / Amy Strong vs Nancy Draughon / Susana Harvey4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBecky King / Meredith Heath vs Palen Mallory / Diane Allen1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RBonello-DUR7117719175
2DAllen.T-DFC1771738240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Shannon Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Sarah Grant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Roni Bonello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Maureen Sredl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Brook Holton Sheahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Sara Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Jeanne Beckley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Amy Strong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Joelle Permutt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Cheryl Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Sarah DeVore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Meredith Heath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Malinda Hain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Christi-Ann Wiltberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Heath + Christi-Ann Wiltberger5266% games+13.3% vs expected
Roni Bonello + Maureen Sredl12757% games+4.2% vs expected
Brook Holton Sheahan + Shannon Lawrence4257% games−0.8% vs expected
Sarah Grant + Shannon Lawrence11265% games−3.0% vs expected
Sara Howard + Shannon Lawrence4361% gamesnot enough data
Sara Howard + Sarah Grant404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Strong + Joelle Permutt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Lawrence
32W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.99
Sarah Grant
34W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Roni Bonello
171W–109L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Maureen Sredl
163W–152L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Brook Holton Sheahan
217W–130L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
Sara Howard
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Jeanne Beckley
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Amy Strong
29W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Joelle Permutt
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Cheryl Stevens
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Sarah DeVore
66W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Meredith Heath
41W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Malinda Hain
59W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Christi-Ann Wiltberger
61W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.