Teams

DAllen.T-DFC

2026 Eno River Tri-Level 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-13vs RBonello-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesKyle Gouchoe-Hanas / Amy Johnston vs Jeanne Beckley / Cheryl Stevens2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Nancy Draughon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-30vs RBonello-DURLost 01
L#2 DoublesPalen Mallory / Amy Johnston vs Sarah DeVore / Amy Strong3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-23vs RBonello-DURSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Nancy Draughon vs Jeanne Beckley / Amy Strong6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Allen / Lindsey Wu vs Becky King / Meredith Heath5-7, 3-6
2026-06-16vs RBonello-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lacoff / Connie Kim vs Brook Holton Sheahan / Shannon Lawrence3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Parker / Amy Johnston vs Joelle Permutt / Cheryl Stevens6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Allen / Paige Giguere vs Becky King / Malinda Hain3-6, 2-6
2026-06-12vs RBonello-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lacoff / Sharon Huang vs Sara Howard / Brook Holton Sheahan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Parker / Amy Johnston vs Joelle Permutt / Jeanne Beckley1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Giguere / Diane Allen vs Malinda Hain / Meredith Heath6-7, 4-6
2026-06-09vs RBonello-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Huang / Amanda Lacoff vs Sarah Grant / Sara Howard1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Johnston / Taylor Harding vs Joelle Permutt / Amy Strong6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindsey Wu / Diane Allen vs Meredith Heath / Christi-Ann Wiltberger3-6, 4-6
2026-06-02vs RBonello-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lacoff / Connie Kim vs Roni Bonello / Shannon Lawrence6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Nancy Draughon vs Sarah DeVore / Cheryl Stevens6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPalen Mallory / Diane Allen vs Christi-Ann Wiltberger / Becky King3-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs RBonello-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesConnie Kim / Amy Johnston vs Maureen Sredl / Sarah Grant1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Draughon / Susana Harvey vs Cheryl Stevens / Amy Strong6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPalen Mallory / Diane Allen vs Becky King / Meredith Heath6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RBonello-DUR7117719175
2DAllen.T-DFC1771738240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Susana Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.69
Lori Hatlen
published 4
3.66
Amanda Lacoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Nancy Draughon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Amy Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Lindsey Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Marcelle Scheyer
published
2.82
Taylor Harding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Paige Giguere
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Palen Mallory
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Draughon + Susana Harvey551264% games+2.2% vs expected
Lori Hatlen + Susana Harvey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
401W–157L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Lori Hatlen
137W–170L career · type A · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Amanda Lacoff
189W–114L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Nancy Draughon
210W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Amy Johnston
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Lindsey Wu
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Marcelle Scheyer
9W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.88
Taylor Harding
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Paige Giguere
37W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Palen Mallory
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.