Teams

BP-Tippins/Burks

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Women) - Fall

21 players · average NTRP 3.79 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-14vs BP-KENKELSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Copenhaver / Tish Elizalde vs Julia Walls / Ashley Dreyer7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTaya Person vs Meagan Frye6-0, 6-0
2024-12-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Hollis / Tish Elizalde vs Dede Laird / Shayn Bausch6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTaya Person vs Heather Spigner6-1, 6-0
2024-11-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesMegan Hollis / Tish Elizalde vs Heidi Bristol / Jennifer Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-16Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTaya Person vs Sarah Pounders1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-26Split 11
W#2 DoublesTish Elizalde / Janet Caswell vs Helen Bass / Sherry Lehman6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesRamona Parsaei vs Katherine Winkenwerder1-6, 2-6
2024-10-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesTaya Person vs Stephanie Yonkin6-1, 6-1
2024-09-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesTaya Person vs Katherine Winkenwerder6-1, 6-2
2024-09-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesTaya Person vs Stephanie Yonkin6-3, 6-1
2024-09-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesTaya Person vs Tammy Kenkel6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Women) - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BP-Tippins/Burks81341126290
2BP-Smith54301535334
3BP-KENKEL54222352417
4BP-Cannon0944183510

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Tracy Copenhaver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.99
Brienne Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.96
Mary Tippins
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.90
Pat Ventura
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.90
Evan Pollock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Rachel Lovett
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.87
Tish Elizalde
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Katie Helmly
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Tracy Burks
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.80
Christi Wood
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Bernadette Staudt
usually #3 Doubles 69%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.77
Janet Caswell
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.75
Megan Hollis
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
3.67
Deepa Kayyar
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.67
Kelly Pendarvis
published
3.59
Carrie Coggins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Tobia Makover
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Alyssa Drought
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Lindsey Eberle
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Ramona Parsaei
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Taya Person
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Lovett + Deepa Kayyar4175% games+23.3% vs expected
Pat Ventura + Megan Hollis8851% games+8.6% vs expected
Evan Pollock + Janet Caswell13559% games+3.0% vs expected
Tobia Makover + Rachel Lovett10655% games−1.2% vs expected
Bernadette Staudt + Tracy Burks4253% gamesnot enough data
Christi Wood + Tracy Burks5063% gamesnot enough data
Katie Helmly + Janet Caswell2356% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Copenhaver + Brienne Walsh404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Copenhaver
28W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Brienne Walsh
59W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Mary Tippins
58W–18L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Pat Ventura
47W–21L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Evan Pollock
37W–34L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Rachel Lovett
74W–31L career · 23 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
Tish Elizalde
25W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Katie Helmly
26W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.83
Tracy Burks
24W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Christi Wood
19W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bernadette Staudt
31W–29L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Janet Caswell
29W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Megan Hollis
49W–25L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Deepa Kayyar
53W–8L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.67
Kelly Pendarvis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
3.5
Carrie Coggins
45W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Tobia Makover
43W–23L career · 15 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Alyssa Drought
10W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Lindsey Eberle
8W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.25
Ramona Parsaei
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Taya Person
13W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.