Teams

BP-Cannon

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Women) - Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.56 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-16vs BP-SmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesDede Laird / Laurie Sattler vs Helen Johnson / Jennifer Smith0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Summerell / Christine Midwood vs Kim Grimmett / Fonda Salgueiro1-6, 2-6
2024-10-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather Spigner / Cindy Mantele vs Kelly McKee / Evan Pollock1-6, 1-6
2024-10-19Lost 02
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Summerell vs Anne Brooks2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDede Laird / Laurie Sattler vs Heidi Bristol / Luba Lowry7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-12vs BP-KENKELLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarrie Stubbs-Vetrovsky / Cindy Mantele vs Barbara D'Angelo / Terri Chaney3-6, 3-6
2024-09-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCarrie Stubbs-Vetrovsky / Elizabeth Summerell vs Katie Helmly / Bernadette Staudt1-6, 0-6
2024-09-23vs BP-SmithLost 01
L#3 DoublesHelen Bass / Elizabeth Summerell vs Fonda Salgueiro / Sylvia Howle4-6, 1-6
2024-09-21vs BP-KENKELLost 02
L#2 SinglesAshley Getwan vs Maggie Dransfeld2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Summerell / Heather Spigner vs Gennie Long / Sarah Pounders1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Women) - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BP-Tippins/Burks81341126290
2BP-Smith54301535334
3BP-KENKEL54222352417
4BP-Cannon0944183510

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Sara Kubik
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.63
Juliet Chisolm
usually #2 Doubles 69%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
3.51
Shayn Bausch
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Helen Bass
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
3.36
Dede Laird
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.32
Christine Midwood
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.31
Laurie Sattler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Cindy Mantele
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Heather Spigner
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
3.19
Wanda Frost
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.16
Carrie Stubbs-Vetrovsky
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Deborah Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Elizabeth Summerell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Ashley Getwan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Katherine Winkenwerder
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Sherry Lehman
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dede Laird + Helen Bass1542% games+5.6% vs expected
Dede Laird + Shayn Bausch1835% games−3.1% vs expected
Shayn Bausch + Sara Kubik3643% games−4.5% vs expected
Carrie Stubbs-Vetrovsky + Elizabeth Summerell1433% gamesnot enough data
Dede Laird + Laurie Sattler033 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Mantele + Constance Buckley033 matchesnot enough data
Shayn Bausch + Laurie Sattler123 matchesnot enough data
Shayn Bausch + Helen Bass033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Kubik
52W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Juliet Chisolm
52W–24L career · 13 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
Shayn Bausch
19W–47L career · 15 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Helen Bass
8W–25L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
4
Constance Buckley
0W–13L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Dede Laird
27W–64L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Christine Midwood
13W–33L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Laurie Sattler
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cindy Mantele
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Heather Spigner
25W–63L career · 25 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Wanda Frost
18W–28L career · 10 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carrie Stubbs-Vetrovsky
3W–17L career · 14 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Deborah Cannon
7W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Elizabeth Summerell
6W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Ashley Getwan
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Winkenwerder
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherry Lehman
2W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.