Teams

Howard/LF

2022 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 5.0 WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-28vs Corcoran-Stone/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesVictoria Silva / Brandi Redman vs Caroline Snapp / Yolande Platvoet6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesValeria Mica / Piper Finley vs Caroline Henry / Olivia Charvat6-4, 6-4
2022-06-22vs Corcoran-Stone/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria Silva / Tiffany Milner vs Olivia Charvat / Caroline Snapp6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesElissandra Bailey vs Julia Mongin2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPiper Finley / Valeria Mica vs Yolande Platvoet / Angela Smith4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-16vs Corcoran-Stone/LFSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVictoria Silva / Elissandra Bailey vs Jacqueline Burks / Olivia Charvat6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Linn Howard / Aubrey Bailey vs Yolande Platvoet / Maresa Boshoff6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-06vs Corcoran-Stone/LFSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTiffany Milner / Rachel Thompson vs Julia Mongin / Angela Smith2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Linn Howard / Elissandra Bailey vs Yolande Platvoet / Maresa Boshoff6-3, 6-3
2022-06-03vs Corcoran-Stone/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Milner / Rachel Thompson vs Julia Mongin / Lizette Corcoran6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesElissandra Bailey vs Caroline Snapp6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesValeria Mica / Jennifer Linn Howard vs Yolande Platvoet / Olivia Charvat5-7, 3-6
2022-05-11vs Corcoran-Stone/LFSplit 11
L#1 DoublesValeria Mica / Piper Finley vs Angela Smith / Yolande Platvoet6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Linn Howard / Elissandra Bailey vs Chelsey Wolever / Jacqueline Burks6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Howard/LF3310818156
2Corcoran-Stone/LF3381022156

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Jennifer Linn Howard
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
4.43
Rachel Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Elissandra Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
Piper Finley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tiffany Milner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Silva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Linn Howard + Elissandra Bailey2435% games−14.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Linn Howard
86W–37L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
4.48
Rachel Thompson
29W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Elissandra Bailey
36W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
Piper Finley
22W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tiffany Milner
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Victoria Silva
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.