Teams

6.0 Williams X55

2023 OCT Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 55 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-29vs 6.0 Pham XX55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBobby Williams / Marianne Banales vs Katie Janssen / John Fabela5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessie Li / John Salvati vs Tri Pham / Penny Springer3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez vs An Ly / Jennifer Williams6-2, 4-2
2023-10-29vs 6.0 Pham XX55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez vs Barry Gordon / Julie A Tieder1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessie Li / John Salvati vs An Ly / Jennifer Williams6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarianne Banales / Bobby Williams vs Tri Pham / Penny Springer1-6, 3-6
2023-10-29vs 6.0 Pham XX55Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJessie Li / John Salvati vs Katie Janssen / Tri Pham2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez vs Barry Gordon / Julie A Tieder3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarianne Banales / Bobby Williams vs Penny Springer / John Fabela2-6, 1-6
2023-10-29vs 6.0 Pham XX55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBobby Williams / Marianne Banales vs Barry Gordon / Julie A Tieder1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez vs Tri Pham / Katie Janssen6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJessie Li / John Salvati vs An Ly / Jennifer Williams6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Jessie Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Steve Benitez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
ANA BENITEZ
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Bobby Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
John Salvati
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marianne Banales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Benitez + ANA BENITEZ505249% games+4.0% vs expected
Jessie Li + John Salvati134 matchesnot enough data
Bobby Williams + Marianne Banales044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessie Li
32W–119L career · 4 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.91
Steve Benitez
144W–213L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
ANA BENITEZ
100W–205L career · 4 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Bobby Williams
23W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Salvati
6W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marianne Banales
7W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.