Teams

6.0 Pham XX55

2023 OCT Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 55 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-29vs 6.0 Williams X55Won 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Janssen / John Fabela vs Bobby Williams / Marianne Banales7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTri Pham / Penny Springer vs Jessie Li / John Salvati6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAn Ly / Jennifer Williams vs ANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez2-6, 2-4
2023-10-29vs 6.0 Williams X55Won 21
W#1 DoublesBarry Gordon / Julie A Tieder vs ANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAn Ly / Jennifer Williams vs Jessie Li / John Salvati2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTri Pham / Penny Springer vs Marianne Banales / Bobby Williams6-1, 6-3
2023-10-29vs 6.0 Williams X55Won 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Janssen / Tri Pham vs Jessie Li / John Salvati6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBarry Gordon / Julie A Tieder vs ANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPenny Springer / John Fabela vs Marianne Banales / Bobby Williams6-2, 6-1
2023-10-29vs 6.0 Williams X55Won 21
W#1 DoublesBarry Gordon / Julie A Tieder vs Bobby Williams / Marianne Banales6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTri Pham / Katie Janssen vs ANA BENITEZ / Steve Benitez1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAn Ly / Jennifer Williams vs Jessie Li / John Salvati7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
An Ly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Julie A Tieder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
John Fabela
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Barry Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Penny Springer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katie Janssen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barry Gordon + Julie A Tieder303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
An Ly
81W–100L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Julie A Tieder
75W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
John Fabela
139W–251L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Barry Gordon
61W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Penny Springer
43W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.62
Katie Janssen
22W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.